Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Tandem mass spectrometry, also known as MS/MS or MS2, is an analytical technique that employs two mass analyzers. Essentially it is a series of mass spectrometers that helps isolate a particular biomolecule and then helps study its chemical properties.
This technique helps gather information regarding the protein from which the peptide was obtained and to study the peptides’ amino acid sequence. Identifying peptides from a complex mixture is an important component of the growing field of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Corona: A Virtual Mass Spectrometer for the Development of Real-Time Mass Spectrometry Software.

Analytical chemistry·2026

Same author

A generalizable Hi-C foundation model for chromatin architecture, single-cell and multiomics analysis across species.

Nature methods·2026

Same author

Label-Free Quantification in the Crux Toolkit.

Journal of proteome research·2026

Same author

Prioritizing peptides for targeted mass spectrometry experiments using deep learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Embryo-scale Visual Cell Sorting reveals a conserved transcriptomic signature of nucleolar size linked to proteostasis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

A quantitative proteomics dataset for assessment and prediction of low dose X-ray radiation exposure in mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same journal

Proteomic Profiling of Endothelial Cells Under Laminar Shear Stress Confirms the Importance of KLF4 in the Regulation of Membrane Protein Expression Compared to Oscillatory Flow.

Journal of proteome research·2026

Same journal

Identification of Age-Associated Circulating Proteins and Lipids in 3800 Comorbidity-Enriched Older Adults from Japan-Based Cohorts Using Olink Assays and MRM Mass Spectrometry.

Journal of proteome research·2026

Same journal

Molecular Solution to the Paradox of Ancient Brain Preservation.

Journal of proteome research·2026

Same journal

From Method-Defined Signals to Reference Measurement Procedures: Two Decades of Mass Spectrometry-Based ProGRP Quantification.

Journal of proteome research·2026

Same journal

Proteomic Profiling of Extracellular Vesicle-Enriched Plasma Using Mag-Net for Biomarker Discovery in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Journal of proteome research·2026

Same journal

Computationally Efficient Bayesian Estimation of Graphical Networks for Omics Data.

Journal of proteome research·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Sample Preparation and Relative Quantitation using Reductive Methylation of Amines for Peptidomics Studies

Sample Preparation and Relative Quantitation using Reductive Methylation of Amines for Peptidomics Studies

Published on: November 4, 2021

Reducing Peptide Sequence Bias in Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Data with Machine Learning.

Ayse B Dincer¹, Yang Lu², Devin K Schweppe²

¹Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.

Journal of Proteome Research

|June 13, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Quantitative mass spectrometry (MS) measurements are affected by peptide sequence biases. A deep neural network, Pepper, identifies and reduces these biases, improving quantification accuracy and correlation with gene expression data.

Keywords:

deep learning machine learning neural networks quantitative mass spectrometry tandem mass spectrometry

More Related Videos

Detection of Protein Ubiquitination Sites by Peptide Enrichment and Mass Spectrometry

Detection of Protein Ubiquitination Sites by Peptide Enrichment and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 23, 2020

Quantitative Proteomics Using Reductive Dimethylation for Stable Isotope Labeling

Quantitative Proteomics Using Reductive Dimethylation for Stable Isotope Labeling

Published on: July 1, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Sample Preparation and Relative Quantitation using Reductive Methylation of Amines for Peptidomics Studies

Sample Preparation and Relative Quantitation using Reductive Methylation of Amines for Peptidomics Studies

Published on: November 4, 2021

Detection of Protein Ubiquitination Sites by Peptide Enrichment and Mass Spectrometry

Detection of Protein Ubiquitination Sites by Peptide Enrichment and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 23, 2020

Quantitative Proteomics Using Reductive Dimethylation for Stable Isotope Labeling

Quantitative Proteomics Using Reductive Dimethylation for Stable Isotope Labeling

Published on: July 1, 2014

Area of Science:

Proteomics
Bioinformatics
Computational Biology

Background:

Quantitative mass spectrometry (MS) measurements of peptides are crucial for proteomics.
These measurements are subject to sequence-specific biases affecting accuracy.
Existing methods struggle to systematically correct for these inherent biases.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide empirical evidence of sequence-specific biases in quantitative MS.
To develop and validate a deep learning model (Pepper) for identifying and reducing these biases.
To improve the accuracy of peptide quantification and its correlation with other biological data.

Main Methods:

Empirical data collection to demonstrate sequence-specific biases.
Development of a deep neural network (Pepper) utilizing tandem mass spectrometry data.
Training and validation of the Pepper model on new proteins and experimental runs.
Comparison of adjusted versus unadjusted abundance measurements against mRNA expression data.

Main Results:

Empirical evidence confirms significant sequence-specific biases in peptide quantification.
The Pepper model successfully identifies and mitigates these biases across different proteins and runs.
Adjusted peptide abundance measurements show improved correlation with mRNA-based gene expression.
Pepper demonstrates versatility across various MS instruments and acquisition methods.

Conclusions:

Sequence-specific biases are a critical factor impacting quantitative proteomics.
Pepper offers an automated and effective solution for bias correction in MS data.
Improved quantification accuracy enhances the biological relevance of proteomics data, particularly when compared to transcriptomics.