Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Autism Spectrum Disorder01:19

Autism Spectrum Disorder

333
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition marked by persistent deficits in social communication and interaction alongside restrictive and repetitive behaviors or interests. ASD is sometimes accompanied by intellectual impairment.
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
333
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.2K
Optimal Arousal Theory01:23

Optimal Arousal Theory

294
The optimal arousal theory suggests that performance is maximized when an individual experiences a moderate level of arousal. This theory is closely tied to the Yerkes-Dodson law, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped relationship between arousal and performance. The law, formulated by psychologists Robert Yerkes and John Dodson, implies an ideal arousal level for optimal performance, and deviations from this level can lead to declines in effectiveness.
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
294
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory01:20

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

501
Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
501

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Getting started with the graded response model: An introduction and tutorial in R.

International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie·2024
Same author

Computational thinking in university students: The role of fluid intelligence and visuospatial ability.

PloS one·2024
Same author

The performance of ChatGPT and Bing on a computerized adaptive test of verbal intelligence.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Measuring Process Factors of Fluid Reasoning Using Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Assessment·2024
Same author

William Stern: The Relevance of His Program of 'Differential Psychology' for Contemporary Intelligence Measurement and Research.

Journal of Intelligence·2023
Same author

Bright, but allergic and neurotic? A critical investigation of the "overexcitable genius" hypothesis.

Frontiers in psychology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance
08:17

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance

Published on: July 19, 2017

7.6K

The Effect of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Motivation and Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hanif Akhtar1,2, Silfiasari2, Boglarka Vekety1

  • 1ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Assessment
|June 14, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) does not significantly impact test-taker anxiety or motivation compared to traditional fixed-item tests (FIT). However, easier CAT versions may reduce anxiety and boost motivation.

Keywords:
anxietycomputerized adaptive testingfixed-item testingmeta-analysismotivation

More Related Videos

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.9K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

907

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance
08:17

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance

Published on: July 19, 2017

7.6K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.9K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

907

Area of Science:

  • Educational Psychology
  • Psychometrics
  • Assessment Technology

Background:

  • Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is increasingly used, but its psychological effects, particularly on motivation and anxiety, are less understood than its psychometric properties.
  • Previous research suggested CAT might enhance motivation and reduce anxiety compared to fixed-item tests (FIT).

Approach:

  • This study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed empirical research directly comparing CAT and FIT.
  • Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis to assess the overall effect of test type on anxiety and motivation.

Key Points:

  • The overall meta-analysis found no significant difference in anxiety or motivation between CAT and FIT.
  • A subgroup analysis revealed that easier CAT versions positively impacted motivation and anxiety compared to FIT.
  • Specific adaptations in CAT administration could yield beneficial psychological outcomes for test-takers.

Conclusions:

  • CAT, in general, does not appear to offer significant psychological advantages over FIT regarding anxiety and motivation.
  • Tailoring CAT difficulty and administration may be crucial for leveraging potential psychological benefits.