Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Implementing a Financial Decision-Making Scale in APS Financial Exploitation Investigations: Use of the PARIHS
Peter A Lichtenberg1,2, Joshua Mandarino3, Lisa Fisher3
1Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Adult protective services agencies successfully implemented the Financial Decision Tracker (FDT) to assess decision-making abilities in financial exploitation cases. Despite a dip during COVID-19, the FDT is now an APS best practices tool.
Area of Science:
- Implementation science
- Gerontology
- Public health
Background:
- Adult protective services (APS) agencies investigate financial exploitation, requiring assessment of decision-making capacity.
- The Financial Decision Tracker (FDT) is a 10-item screening tool for financial decision-making abilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the implementation of the FDT by APS workers over 34 months, including pre-COVID-19, during restrictions, and post-restrictions.
- To assess factors influencing FDT implementation using the Promoting Action in Research Implementation in the Health Services (PARIHS) framework.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the PARIHS framework to examine context, facilitation, and evidence of FDT implementation.
- Conducted individual and group interviews to assess implementation factors.
- Measured FDT scale usage, types of decisions investigated, and alignment with APS worker ratings.
Main Results:
- FDT implementation was sustained over 34 months, despite a 58% usage drop during COVID-19 restrictions.
- A total of 839 FDT scales were administered.
- Individuals without decision-making deficits were older and more likely to have completed high school.
Conclusions:
- The FDT implementation trial was successful, becoming an established best practices tool for APS agencies.
- The FDT's effectiveness in assessing decision-making abilities is recognized and will be audited.
More Related Videos
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
07:05Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...