Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics
Published on: April 19, 2024
Impact of Breathing Pattern and Nebulization on Expelled Viral Content During Mechanical Ventilation Using an Ex Vivo
Brian J Ring1, Kareen Pestana2, Vanna Sombatsaphay2
1Department of Applied Physiology, Health, and Clinical Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina. brian.ring44@gmail.com.
Background:
Little is known about the fate of expelled viral particulates during the aerosolization of inhaled medications during mechanical ventilation. We hypothesized that breathing patterns that generate a greater degree of shear stress and turbulent air flow will produce a greater concentration of exhaled viral RNA with the presence of a nebulizer during mechanical ventilation.
Methods:
Eight ex vivo pig lungs were utilized as the physiological model. Each lung was dedicated to a specific breathing pattern that consisted of tidal breathing, respiratory distress, cough, and sneeze. Breath simulations were carried out through a commercial mechanical ventilator. Ninety mL of a bacteriophage stock at a concentration of 108 PFU/mL were introduced into the lungs during a 10-min sample collection session. The number of viral particles collected in exhalate was measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The impact of breathing pattern on measured viruses was analyzed through two-way analysis of variance.
Results:
The interaction effect between nebulization and breath pattern on exhaled viral quantity was not statistically significant P = .80, partial η2 = 0.167. The analysis of the main effects indicated that the effects of the breathing pattern and nebulization phase were not statistically significant P = .26, partial η2 = 0.519; P = .98, partial η2 = 0, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences among the breathing patterns related to measurable viral RNA. Coughing produced the most measurable increase in measured viral quantity during the nebulization phase and non-nebulization phase with a mean exhaled viral quantity (3.5 × 105 ng/μL [95% CI 1.6 × 105-5.5 × 105] and 2.7 × 105 ng/μL [95% CI 7.1 × 103-5.5 × 105], respectively). Tidal breathing with the presence of a nebulizer and respiratory distress without a nebulizer produced the lowest measured viral quantities (M = 1.1 × 105 ng/μL [95% CI -1.7 × 105 to 3.9 × 105]; M = 1.2 × 105 ng/μL [95% CI -1.6 × 105 to 4.0 × 105]).
Conclusions:
In this ex vivo porcine model, the introduction of a nebulizer did not increase the mean viral RNA captured throughout all of the breathing patterns.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Pneumonia II: Pathophysiology

