Key Findings From Peer-Reviewed Published Research by the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in
Sunil Sabharwal1, Carolyn L Kinney, Mikaela M Raddatz
1From the Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (SS); VA Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts (SS); American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rochester, Minnesota (CLK, MMR); Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (CLK); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (SWD); University of Texas Health Science Center, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas (GEF); TIRR Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas (GEF); and University of Toronto, St John's Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (LRR).
Abstract:
Recognizing the dearth of published research on board certification in physical medicine and rehabilitation and its subspecialties, the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation has increased efforts to conduct and disseminate research in this area. This report summarizes key findings of peer-reviewed studies published by American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation staff and leadership in the past 6 yrs, including those conducted in partnership with other entities. The reported studies are organized in three main categories: initial certification, continuing certification, and subspecialty certification in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Related findings are further grouped into subsections that include psychometric evaluation of certification examinations, association of candidate characteristics with certification performance, relationship of certification performance to other measures, and candidate reaction and feedback. Collectively, the summarized results provide evidence that the board certification process is reliable, statistically valid, and predictive of the risk of disciplinary action in subsequent years. These studies also describe facets of our specialty including degree of subspecialization, burnout, and how people maintain certification over time. We hope that physical medicine and rehabilitation trainees, diplomates, institutions, programs, and other stakeholders find this information useful and look forward to continuing research in these and other areas in the spirit of constant evidence-based improvement and feedback to our specialty.
