Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...

¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling

¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling

The coupling interactions of nuclei across four or more bonds are usually weak, with J values less than 1 Hz. While these are usually not observed in spectra, the presence of multiple bonds along the coupling pathway can result in observable long-range coupling.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks

DNA replication is initiated at sites containing predefined DNA sequences known as origins of replication. DNA is unwound at these sites by the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase and other factors such as Cdc45 and the associated GINS complex.The unwound single strands are protected by replication protein A (RPA) until DNA polymerase starts synthesizing DNA at the 5’ end of the strand in the same direction as the replication fork. To prevent the replication fork from falling apart,...

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Exact computation of Lyapunov exponents via system parameters in multi-triangle chaotic maps: Bifurcation analysis and circuit realization.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026

Same author

Collective dynamics and synchronization of coupled hair-bundle models with elastic and viscous interactions.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026

Same author

Preconditioning Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Enhance Performance in the Degenerate Nucleus Pulposus.

Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews·2026

Same author

Locally active memristor-based Chialvo neuron model: bifurcation, multistability, and noise effects.

Cognitive neurodynamics·2026

Same author

Interpretable liquid crystal phase classification via two-by-two ordinal patterns.

Physical review. E·2026

Same author

Rumor propagation and supervision during confrontation: An importance-driven SIRQS network model.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026

Same journal

Erratum: Low-dimensional model for adaptive networks of spiking neurons [Phys. Rev. E 111, 014422 (2025)].

Physical review. E·2026

Same journal

Disentangling the effects of many-body forces on depletion interactions.

Physical review. E·2026

Same journal

Charge transport and mode transition in dual-energy electron beam diodes.

Physical review. E·2026

Same journal

Optimization of multisite reactions in complex compartmentalized media.

Physical review. E·2026

Same journal

Origin of geometric cohesion in nonconvex granular materials: Interplay between interdigitation and rotational constraints enhancing frictional stability.

Physical review. E·2026

Same journal

Interaction of walkers with a standing Faraday wave.

Physical review. E·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Observation and Analysis of Blinking Surface-enhanced Raman Scattering

Observation and Analysis of Blinking Surface-enhanced Raman Scattering

Published on: January 11, 2018

Blinking coupling enhances network synchronization.

Fatemeh Parastesh¹, Karthikeyan Rajagopal², Sajad Jafari^1,3

¹Department of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Iran.

Physical Review. E

|June 16, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study reveals that faster periodic coupling in blinking networks enhances synchronization. Synchronization stability depends on averaged coupling, not instantaneous coupling, improving network dynamics.

More Related Videos

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

Multifunctional Setup for Studying Human Motor Control Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Electromyography, Motion Capture, and Virtual Reality

Multifunctional Setup for Studying Human Motor Control Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Electromyography, Motion Capture, and Virtual Reality

Published on: September 3, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Observation and Analysis of Blinking Surface-enhanced Raman Scattering

Observation and Analysis of Blinking Surface-enhanced Raman Scattering

Published on: January 11, 2018

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

Multifunctional Setup for Studying Human Motor Control Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Electromyography, Motion Capture, and Virtual Reality

Multifunctional Setup for Studying Human Motor Control Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Electromyography, Motion Capture, and Virtual Reality

Published on: September 3, 2015

Area of Science:

Complex Networks
Nonlinear Dynamics
Systems Biology

Background:

Network synchronization is crucial for understanding complex systems.
Diffusive coupling is a common mechanism for synchronization.
Periodic variations in coupling can significantly alter network behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the synchronization of networks with periodically blinking linear diffusive coupling.
To investigate how blinking period affects network synchronization stability.
To compare blinking coupling with single-variable and averaged coupling.

Main Methods:

Linear stability analysis of the synchronous solution.
Utilizing the Hindmarsh-Rose model for node dynamics.
Numerical simulations of average synchronization error.

Main Results:

Synchronization stability depends on averaged coupling, not instantaneous coupling, for fast blinking.
Decreasing the blinking period reduces the required coupling strength for synchrony.
Blinking coupling enhances synchronization compared to single-variable coupling.

Conclusions:

Fast blinking coupling can lead to enhanced network synchronization.
The averaged coupling strength is a key factor in blinking network synchronization.
Blinking coupling offers a more efficient synchronization mechanism than single-variable coupling.