Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

85
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
85
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.1K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.1K
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

704
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
704
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.3K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.3K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

186
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
186
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

8.9K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
8.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Role of the Keratinized Mucosa in Peri-Implant Diseases Onset and Brushing Discomfort: A 10-Year Follow-Up.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same author

Fracture rate and risk factors associated with the fracture of narrow diameter implants: A long-term retrospective analysis.

Clinical oral implants research·2024
Same author

Alveolar ridge bone changes in patients treated with the split-crest technique with simultaneous implant placement: A retrospective longitudinal observational study.

Clinical oral implants research·2024
Same author

Four single implant-supported crowns replacing the maxillary incisors: A retrospective report of 10 cases with 2-9 years of follow-up.

Clinical oral implants research·2023
Same author

The effect of brushing discomfort on peri-implant health in sites exhibiting inadequate keratinized mucosa width: A cross-sectional study.

Clinical oral implants research·2022
Same author

A new cure rate regression framework for bivariate data based on the Chen distribution.

Statistical methods in medical research·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Accurate estimation for extra-Poisson variability assuming random effect models.

Ricardo Puziol de Oliveira1, Jorge Alberto Achcar1

  • 1Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.

Journal of Applied Statistics
|June 16, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a Bayesian random effect model for more accurate estimation of extra-Poisson variability components. It outperforms the standard negative binomial distribution method, which can only estimate one component.

Keywords:
Bayesian methodsExtra-Poisson variability componentscount datanegative binomial distributionrandom effect models

More Related Videos

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.8K
Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies
10:50

Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies

Published on: November 8, 2018

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.8K
Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies
10:50

Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies

Published on: November 8, 2018

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Computational Statistics

Background:

  • Extra-Poisson variability is a common issue in count data analysis, often addressed using the negative binomial distribution.
  • Existing methods, like the negative binomial distribution, have limitations in fully capturing the components of extra-Poisson variability.
  • Accurate estimation of variability components is crucial for robust statistical inference in various scientific fields.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a Bayesian random effect model for estimating extra-Poisson variability components.
  • To compare the proposed model's accuracy against the standard negative binomial distribution approach.
  • To demonstrate the practical application of the new methodology using real-world datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Bayesian inference was employed to estimate parameters within a random effect model framework.
  • The proposed random effect model was designed to capture multiple components of extra-Poisson variability.
  • Performance was assessed by comparing estimation accuracy with the traditional negative binomial distribution method.

Main Results:

  • The Bayesian random effect model provided more accurate estimates for extra-Poisson variability components.
  • The negative binomial distribution method was found to be limited, estimating only a single component of variability.
  • Illustrative examples using real data confirmed the superiority of the proposed random effect model.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed Bayesian random effect model offers a more comprehensive and accurate approach to estimating extra-Poisson variability.
  • This method overcomes limitations of the negative binomial distribution, enabling better understanding of count data dispersion.
  • The findings have significant implications for statistical modeling and analysis in fields dealing with overdispersed count data.