Controlling the error probabilities of model selection information criteria using bootstrapping
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Michael Cullan1, Scott Lidgard2, Beckett Sterner3
1School of Mathematics and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Abstract:
The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and related information criteria are powerful and increasingly popular tools for comparing multiple, non-nested models without the specification of a null model. However, existing procedures for information-theoretic model selection do not provide explicit and uniform control over error rates for the choice between models, a key feature of classical hypothesis testing. We show how to extend notions of Type-I and Type-II error to more than two models without requiring a null. We then present the Error Control for Information Criteria (ECIC) method, a bootstrap approach to controlling Type-I error using Difference of Goodness of Fit (DGOF) distributions. We apply ECIC to empirical and simulated data in time series and regression contexts to illustrate its value for parametric Neyman-Pearson classification. An R package implementing the bootstrap method is publicly available.
Related Concept Videos
Bootstrapping
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Random and Systematic Errors
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

