Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Controlling the error probabilities of model selection information criteria using bootstrapping
Michael Cullan1, Scott Lidgard2, Beckett Sterner3
1School of Mathematics and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Abstract:
The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and related information criteria are powerful and increasingly popular tools for comparing multiple, non-nested models without the specification of a null model. However, existing procedures for information-theoretic model selection do not provide explicit and uniform control over error rates for the choice between models, a key feature of classical hypothesis testing. We show how to extend notions of Type-I and Type-II error to more than two models without requiring a null. We then present the Error Control for Information Criteria (ECIC) method, a bootstrap approach to controlling Type-I error using Difference of Goodness of Fit (DGOF) distributions. We apply ECIC to empirical and simulated data in time series and regression contexts to illustrate its value for parametric Neyman-Pearson classification. An R package implementing the bootstrap method is publicly available.
Related Concept Videos
Bootstrapping
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Random and Systematic Errors
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

