Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

08:49
Injecting Gryllus bimaculatus Eggs
Published on: August 22, 2019
17.3K
Egg Predation by Phytoseiid Predatory Mites: Is There Intraguild Predation Towards Predatory Bug Eggs?
Dominiek Vangansbeke1, Marcus V A Duarte1, Juliette Pijnakker1
1Biobest N.V., Ilse Velden 18, B-2260 Westerlo, Belgium.
Journal of Economic Entomology
|June 16, 2022
Summary
Phytoseiid mites can prey on thrips eggs, but not all species are effective. Amblyseius swirskii and Amblydromalus limonicus can consume thrips eggs, while Transeius montdorensis cannot. Predatory mite presence does not impact predatory bug egg hatching.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Entomology
- Biological Control
- Predator-Prey Interactions
Background:
- Phytoseiid mites are key biocontrol agents against thrips pests.
- Previously, only immature thrips were considered vulnerable to phytoseiids.
- Recent findings indicate phytoseiids can prey on thrips eggs within leaf tissue.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the ability of three phytoseiid mite species to prey on thrips eggs.
- To determine if these phytoseiids also prey on the eggs of beneficial predatory bugs (mirids and anthocorids) that are inserted into plant tissue.
- To assess the impact of phytoseiid mites on the hatch rates of predatory bug eggs.
Main Methods:
- Tested Amblyseius swirskii, Transeius montdorensis, and Amblydromalus limonicus for their ability to prey on Frankliniella occidentalis eggs in leaf tissue.
- Assessed the predation of phytoseiids on eggs of Orius laevigatus, Macrolophus pygmaeus, and Nesidiocoris tenuis.
- Monitored the hatch rates of predatory bug eggs in the presence of phytoseiid mites.
Main Results:
- Amblyseius swirskii and Amblydromalus limonicus successfully preyed on thrips eggs.
- Transeius montdorensis showed no ability to prey on thrips eggs.
- Phytoseiid mites did not negatively affect the hatch rates of predatory bug eggs inserted in leaves.
Conclusions:
- Certain phytoseiid species, like A. swirskii and A. limonicus, offer potential for controlling thrips by consuming their eggs.
- The predatory behavior of these mites does not jeopardize populations of beneficial predatory bugs that share similar egg-laying habits.
- These findings enhance our understanding of phytoseiid mite efficacy in integrated pest management programs.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
18.8K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
18.8K
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores
13.1K
Plants often form mutualistic relationships with soil-dwelling fungi or bacteria to enhance their roots’ nutrient uptake ability. Root-colonizing fungi (e.g., mycorrhizae) increase a plant’s root surface area, which promotes nutrient absorption. While root-colonizing, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., rhizobia) convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), making nitrogen available to plants for various biological functions. For example, nitrogen is essential for the...
13.1K
Symbiosis
30.3K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
30.3K
Frequency-dependent Selection
22.2K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.2K

