Related Experiment Videos
Revascularization for Renovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Insights
Renal revascularization may benefit select patients with renovascular disease, despite mixed trial results. This statement clarifies which patients can benefit from diagnostic workup and intervention.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Nephrology
- Hypertension
Background:
- Renovascular disease causes secondary hypertension and renal ischemia.
- Randomized trials show renal revascularization is not superior to medical therapy for most atherosclerotic cases.
- This has led to reduced diagnostic workup and revascularization use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review randomized trial limitations in renal revascularization.
- To identify specific patient populations who benefit from revascularization.
- To guide healthcare professionals and the public on diagnostic workup and treatment.
Main Methods:
- Review of randomized trials on renal revascularization.
- Analysis of clinical experience from hypertension centers.
- Synthesis of evidence for selective revascularization scenarios.
Main Results:
- Most trials fail to show broad benefit of revascularization over medical therapy.
- Specific patient groups may still benefit from diagnostic workup and intervention.
- Identification of criteria for selective referral and revascularization is needed.
Conclusions:
- Selective renal revascularization can be beneficial for specific patient populations.
- Further research is needed to define optimal patient selection and treatment strategies.
- Guidelines should be updated to reflect evidence for selective revascularization.
Abstract:
Renovascular disease is a major causal factor for secondary hypertension and renal ischemic disease. However, several prospective, randomized trials for atherosclerotic disease failed to demonstrate that renal revascularization is more effective than medical therapy for most patients. These results have greatly reduced the generalized diagnostic workup and use of renal revascularization. Most guidelines and review articles emphasize the limited average improvement and fail to identify those clinical populations that do benefit from revascularization. On the basis of the clinical experience of hypertension centers, specialists have continued selective revascularization, albeit without a summary statement by a major, multidisciplinary, national organization that identifies specific populations that may benefit. In this scientific statement for health care professionals and the public-at-large, we review the strengths and weaknesses of randomized trials in revascularization and highlight (1) when referral for consideration of diagnostic workup and therapy may be warranted, (2) the evidence/rationale for these selective scenarios, (3) interventional and surgical techniques for effective revascularization, and (4) areas of research with unmet need.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care