Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2025

11:05
SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
Published on: February 6, 2021
15.2K
REACT: Rapid Evaluation Assessment of Clinical Reasoning Tool
Brian D Peterson1, Charles D Magee2, James R Martindale2
1University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine
|June 17, 2022
Summary
A new tool, the Rapid Evaluation Assessment of Clinical Reasoning Tool (REACT), effectively assesses clinical reasoning in urgent situations. This tool shows reliability for formative feedback to improve medical trainee performance and reduce patient harm.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Clinical Reasoning Assessment
- Simulation-Based Learning
Background:
- Clinical reasoning is crucial for diagnosis and management, especially in urgent care.
- Traditional assessment tools may be less effective in high-pressure, time-sensitive urgent clinical situations.
- Situated cognition theory highlights the impact of context on clinical reasoning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and pilot a novel tool for assessing clinical reasoning in urgent care settings.
- To provide formative feedback to medical learners during simulated urgent clinical scenarios.
- To enhance the reliability and validity of clinical reasoning assessment in high-stakes situations.
Main Methods:
- The Rapid Evaluation Assessment of Clinical Reasoning Tool (REACT) was designed by a multidisciplinary team.
- REACT is a behaviorally anchored assessment tool focusing on five key domains.
- A pilot study involved fourth-year medical students in simulated urgent scenarios, scored by independent educators.
Main Results:
- The pilot study demonstrated strong internal consistency for REACT scores (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86).
- Inter-rater reliability for overall scores was found to be moderate (weighted kappa = 0.56).
- The tool was validated using two established frameworks.
Conclusions:
- REACT is the first tool specifically designed for formative assessment of clinical reasoning in simulated urgent situations.
- The tool shows evidence of reliability and content validity for guiding feedback.
- REACT aims to reduce diagnostic and management errors, ultimately limiting patient harm.
Related Concept Videos
Critical Thinking II
3.0K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
3.0K
Patient-centered Care
2.2K
Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
2.2K
Critical Thinking I
3.5K
Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career...
3.5K
Nursing Evaluation
3.5K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.5K
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
1.5K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
1.5K
Critical Thinking
253
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
Colleges and universities are...
253

