Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
Published on: October 11, 2010
Misperceiving and misreporting input quality: Implications for input use and productivity
Tesfamicheal Wossen1, Kibrom A Abay2, Tahirou Abdoulaye3
1International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Kenya.
Abstract:
Farmers in developing countries routinely misperceive or misreport input quality for various reasons, which introduces substantial measurement error in farm survey data. In this paper, we motivate and illustrate, both analytically and empirically, the inferential and behavioral implications of misperception and misreporting using a unique crop variety identification data from Nigeria. Using a non-parametric framework for testing the presence of measurement error, we show that crop variety misclassification in our data is mostly driven by misperception. We then demonstrate the inferential challenges of treating misperception as misreporting and vice versa. Finally, we show that misperception induces crowding-in(out) of complementary agricultural inputs but these misperception-driven input allocations may not necessarily be yield-enhancing. As such, rectifying misperception by addressing agricultural input market imperfections may improve farmers' investment choices and productivity outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Random and Systematic Errors
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...

