Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
Guided Self-Help for Pediatric Obesity in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Kyung E Rhee1, Lourdes Herrera2, David Strong3
1Departments of Pediatrics.
Insights
A guided self-help (GSH) obesity treatment model showed higher attendance rates compared to traditional family-based treatment (FBT). While both models reduced child BMI z-score, GSH offers a promising, less intensive option for primary care settings.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Behavioral Medicine
Background:
- Childhood obesity is a significant public health concern requiring effective treatment strategies.
- Traditional family-based behavioral treatment (FBT) is effective but often resource-intensive and delivered in specialized centers.
- Primary care settings offer greater accessibility for implementing obesity interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of a less intense guided self-help (GSH) program with traditional family-based behavioral treatment (FBT) for childhood obesity.
- To evaluate differences in treatment attendance and child weight status between the two models.
- To assess the feasibility of delivering obesity treatment in a primary care setting.
Main Methods:
- A randomized clinical trial involving 164 children (5-13 years) with BMI ≥85th percentile.
- Intervention group received 14 individual GSH sessions (5.3 hours) in primary care.
- Control group received 20 group-based FBT sessions (20 hours) in an academic center.
- Outcomes included session attendance, change in BMI z-score (BMIz), and percentage from the 95th BMI percentile at post-treatment and 6-month follow-up.
Main Results:
- The guided self-help (GSH) group had significantly higher attendance rates (odds ratio = 2.2, P < 0.01) and a 67% reduced risk of attrition compared to FBT.
- No significant between-group differences were observed in the change of BMI z-score or percentage from the 95th BMI percentile over time.
- A significant reduction in BMI z-score was observed from baseline to post-treatment across both groups (d: 0.60).
Conclusions:
- A less intense guided self-help (GSH) model demonstrates superior attendance and reduced attrition, supporting its implementation in primary care.
- GSH offers a viable, accessible alternative for childhood obesity treatment, potentially increasing patient reach.
- Future research should focus on disseminating and implementing GSH models across diverse settings to broaden access to care.
Objectives:
Our aim was to compare the effect of 2 treatment models on attendance and child weight status: a less intense guided self-help (GSH) program delivered in the primary care setting versus traditional family-based behavioral treatment (FBT) delivered in an academic center.
Methods:
We conducted a randomized clinical trial among 164 children between 5 and 13 years old with a BMI ≥85th percentile and their parents. The intervention group (GSH) received 14 individual sessions over 6 months, with 5.3 hours of treatment. The control group (FBT) received 20 group-based sessions over 6 months, with 20 hours of treatment. Main outcomes included proportion of sessions families attended and change in child BMI z-score (BMIz), percentage from the 95th BMI percentile, difference from the 95th BMI percentile at the end of treatment, and 6-month follow-up.
Results:
Mean age of children was 9.6 years, BMI z-score 2.1, 49% female, and >90% Latino. The odds of attending GSH compared to FBT was 2.2 (P < 0.01). Those assigned to GSH had a 67% reduced risk of attrition (hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.50, P < .001). Intent-to-treat analysis showed no between-group differences in change in BMIz and percentage from the 95th BMI percentile over time. Combined, there was a significant reduction in BMIz from baseline to posttreatment (β = -0.07 (0.01), P < .01, d: 0.60) and a slight increase from posttreatment to follow-up (β = 0.007 (0.13), P = .56).
Conclusions:
This study provides support for a novel, less intense GSH model of obesity treatment, which can be implemented in the primary care setting. Future studies should examine effective approaches to dissemination and implementation of GSH in different settings to increase access to treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Obesity
Binge Eating Disorders
Clinical Trials: Overview
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Self-Schemas
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

