Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Published on: June 29, 2013
Risk Stratification for Pregnancies Diagnosed With Fetal Growth Restriction Based on Placental MRI
Yuki Himoto1, Koji Fujimoto2, Aki Kido3
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Background:
Diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (FGR) entails difficulties with differentiating fetuses not fulfilling their growth potential because of pathologic conditions, such as placental insufficiency, from constitutionally small fetuses. The feasibility of placental MRI for risk stratification among pregnancies diagnosed with FGR remains unexplored.
Purpose:
To explore quantitative MRI features useful to identify pregnancies with unfavorable outcomes and to assess the diagnostic performance of visual analysis of MRI to detect pregnancies with unfavorable outcomes, among pregnancies diagnosed with FGR.
Study Type:
Retrospective.
Population:
Thirteen pregnancies with unfavorable outcomes (preterm emergency cesarean section or intrauterine fetal death) and 11 pregnancies with favorable outcomes performed MRI at gestational weeks 21-36.
Field Strength/Sequence:
A 5-T, half-Fourier-acquired single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE), spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) and T2 map derived from SE-EPI.
Assessment:
Placental size on HASTE sequences and T2 mapping-based histogram features were extracted. Three radiologists qualitatively evaluated the visibility of maternal cotyledon on HASTE and SE-EPI sequences with echo times (TEs) = 60, 90, and 120 msec using 3-point Likert scales: 0, absent; 1, equivocal; and 2, present.
Statistical Tests:
Welch's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for quantitative features between the favorable and unfavorable outcome groups. Areas under the receiver operating curves (AUCs) of the three readers' visual analyses to detect pregnancies with unfavorable outcomes. A P value of <0.05 was inferred as statistically significant.
Results:
Placental size (major and minor axis, estimated area of placental bed, and volume of placenta) and T2 mapping-based histogram features (mean, skewness, and kurtosis) were statistically significantly different between the two groups. Visual analysis of HASTE and SE-EPI with TE = 60 msec showed AUCs of 0.80-0.86 to detect pregnancies with unfavorable outcomes.
Data Conclusion:
Placental size, histogram features, and visual analysis of placental MRI may allow for risk stratification regarding outcomes among pregnancies diagnosed with FGR.
Evidence Level:
3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Teratogenicity

