Should Children Be Enrolled in Clinical Research in Conflict Zones?
Dónal O'Mathúna1, Nawaraj Upadhaya2
1Associate professor in the College of Nursing and the Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities at Ohio State University in Columbus.
Insights
Conducting research with children in conflict zones presents ethical challenges, including resource allocation and consent. Simultaneous research and clinical care are possible through community engagement to address these issues.
Area of Science:
- Medical ethics
- Global health research
- Pediatric research
Background:
- Ethical considerations for research in high-risk environments are complex.
- Children in conflict zones face unique vulnerabilities.
- Balancing clinical care with research demands is a critical challenge.
Observation:
- Four key ethical issues identified: resource allocation, informed consent for minors, research feasibility, and maintaining neutrality.
- Challenges in obtaining consent due to parental/guardian separation.
- Ethical concerns regarding research feasibility and completion rates.
- The imperative to maintain neutrality, impartiality, and humanity in research.
Findings:
- Simultaneous clinical care and research are proposed as a viable approach.
- Humble engagement with communities during all research phases is crucial.
- Proactive community engagement can help resolve ethical dilemmas.
Implications:
- This approach can improve ethical research conduct in conflict zones.
- It highlights the importance of community-centered research methodologies.
- Findings offer guidance for clinicians and researchers working with vulnerable pediatric populations in crisis settings.
Abstract:
This commentary examines 4 ethical issues in a case of clinicians considering conducting research on children in conflict zones: (1) whether any time or resources should be taken away from treating acute injuries in order to conduct research; (2) obtaining consent for children to participate in research, which is particularly challenging given that children can be separated from parents or guardians; (3) whether the research is feasible at the moment, since starting research that stands little chance of being completed is ethically questionable; and (4) maintaining neutrality, impartiality, and humanity. Research that puts participants and researchers at risk of additional harm must be considered carefully. Here, we propose that both research and clinical care might occur simultaneously when researchers engage humbly with involved communities as the research is being designed, conducted, and reported in order to understand and resolve ethical issues involved.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Ethics in Research
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Blinding


