Long-term follow-up of treatment-naïve HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B

Yusuf Emre Ozdemir1, Meryem Sahin Ozdemir2, Osman Faruk Bayramlar3

  • 1Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 34098, Istanbul, Turkey.

Insights

Long-term oral antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) showed similar complete virological response (CVR) rates across agents. Younger age and lower baseline viral load predict CVR in HBeAg-negative CHB patients.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatology
  • Virology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a significant global health concern.
  • HBeAg-negative CHB requires long-term management with oral antiviral agents.
  • Understanding factors influencing treatment response is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the long-term efficacy of oral antiviral agents in treatment-naïve HBeAg-negative CHB patients.
  • To identify predictors of complete virological response (CVR).
  • To assess drug resistance, virological breakthroughs, and side effects during extended therapy.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 173 HBeAg-negative CHB patients treated for at least 3 years.
  • Comparison of CVR rates among tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), lamivudine (LAM), entecavir (ETV), and telbivudine (LdT).
  • Multivariate analysis to determine independent factors associated with CVR.

Main Results:

  • CVR rates were high and similar across TDF (82.8%), LAM (84.4%), ETV (83.9%), and LdT (95%).
  • Independent predictors for CVR included younger age (≤40 years) and lower baseline HBV DNA levels.
  • Virological breakthrough was notable with LAM (50%), while side effects were observed with LdT and ETV.

Conclusions:

  • Oral antiviral agents demonstrate comparable long-term CVR in HBeAg-negative CHB.
  • Younger age and lower baseline viral load are key factors for achieving virological response.
  • LAM exhibited higher rates of resistance/breakthrough, and LdT had notable side effects, necessitating careful patient monitoring.
Abstract