Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The 10 Commandments of Antiplatelet Management Before and After CABG.

Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Intra-institutional use of positive deviancy in surgical infections in isolated coronary bypass.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026
Same author

Stop the Invasion-Advances in Myocardial Revascularization.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2026
Same author

Secondary Prevention After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: 2026 Update: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Circulation·2026
Same author

The path towards an accessible blood pressure monitor for persons living with low vision or blindness: a Canadian pilot study.

Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology·2026
Same author

Why MICS Has Been the Future of CABG for The Last 20 Years?

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 7, 2025

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.5K

Current surgical bioprostheses: Looking to the future.

Nadia A Clarizia1, Vinayak N Bapat2, Marc Ruel1

  • 1University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
|June 19, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Bioprosthetic heart valves offer advantages like avoiding anticoagulation, but increasing use, especially in younger patients, will lead to more valve failures. Future focus must be on durability, anticoagulation, and patient choice.

Keywords:
Bioprosthetic valve failureValve replacement

More Related Videos

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

6.6K
Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
14:31

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

Published on: July 15, 2009

14.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 7, 2025

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.5K
3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

6.6K
Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
14:31

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

Published on: July 15, 2009

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Bioprosthetic heart valve use is rising across all age demographics.
  • Patient benefits include avoiding anticoagulation and reduced thrombotic/hemorrhagic events.
  • Transcatheter valve-in-valve interventions are expanding for aortic and mitral positions, lowering reintervention morbidity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the increasing utilization of bioprosthetic heart valves.
  • To highlight the associated benefits and challenges of bioprosthetic valve use.
  • To address the future implications of increasing bioprosthetic valve failure rates.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on bioprosthetic valve utilization trends.
  • Analysis of patient-reported outcomes and procedural data.
  • Projection of future trends in bioprosthetic valve performance and failure.

Main Results:

  • Bioprosthetic valve implantation is increasing across all age groups.
  • Improvements in hemodynamics and durability enhance bioprosthetic valve suitability.
  • Growing usage, particularly in younger patients, portends an increase in failing bioprosthetic valves.

Conclusions:

  • Bioprosthetic valves are a viable option due to improved features and less invasive interventions.
  • The rising number of failing valves necessitates focus on long-term durability and anticoagulation strategies.
  • Patient-centered decision-making regarding prosthesis selection is crucial for optimal outcomes.