Related Experiment Video For Endoscopic ultrasound
Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Biopsy Techniques with Transesophageal Ultrasound
Published on: November 21, 2023
Why is endosonography insufficient for residual diagnosis after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer? Solutions
Shohei Yonemoto1, Masaya Uesato2, Akira Nakano1
1Frontier Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Background:
The diagnosis of residual tumors using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer is considered challenging. However, the reasons for this difficulty are not well understood.
Aim:
To investigate the ultrasound imaging features of residual tumors and identify the limitations and potential of EUS.
Methods:
This exploratory prospective observational study enrolled 23 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy [15 patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and 8 patients after chemoradiotherapy (CRT)] at the Department of Surgery, Chiba University Hospital, between May 2020 and October 2021. We diagnosed the T stage for specimens using ultrasound just after surgery and compared ultrasound images with the cut surface of the fixed specimens of the same level of residual tumor. The ratio of esophageal muscle layer defect measured by ultrasound was compared with clinicopathological factors. Furthermore, the rate of reduction for the muscle layer defect was evaluated using EUS images obtained before and after neoadjuvant therapy.
Results:
The accuracy of T stage rate was 61% (n = 14/23), which worsened after CRT (38%, n = 3/8) than after NAC (73%, n = 11/15) because of overstaging. Moreover, pT0 could not be diagnosed in all cases. The detection rate of residual tumor for specimens using ultrasound retrospectively was 75% (n = 15/20). There was no correlation between after-NAC (79%, n = 11/14) and after-CRT (67%, n = 4/6) detection rate. The detection of superficial and submucosal types was poor. The pathologic tumor size and pathological response were correlated. Tumor borders were irregular and echogenicity was mixed type after CRT. There was a correlation between the pT stage (pT0/1 vs pT2/3) and the length of muscle layer circumference (P = 0.025), the length of muscle layer defect (P < 0.001), and the ratio of muscle layer defect (P < 0.001). There was also a correlation between the pT stage and the rate of muscle layer defect reduction measured by EUS (P = 0.001).
Conclusion:
Compared to pathological images, some tumors are undetectable by ultrasound. Focusing on the esophageal muscle layer might help diagnose the depth of the residual tumor.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...

