Economic Evaluation of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Compared to Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in

Weicong Zhang1, Yake Lou2, Yujiang Liu1

  • 1Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Insights

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not cost-effective in China compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). TAVR could become cost-effective if its price is reduced by approximately 65%.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Health Economics
  • Medical Technology Assessment

Background:

  • Aortic stenosis (AS) is a severe condition leading to heart failure and sudden death.
  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) are recommended for intermediate-risk patients.
  • The cost-effectiveness of TAVR versus SAVR in China remains unexamined.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TAVR compared to SAVR in China.
  • To determine the economic viability of TAVR for treating aortic stenosis in the Chinese healthcare system.

Main Methods:

  • A combined decision tree and Markov model simulated a 5-year period.
  • The primary metric was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
  • Sensitivity analyses (one-way and probabilistic) assessed model robustness.

Main Results:

  • TAVR incurred higher costs ($54,573) and yielded slightly better effectiveness (2.826 QALY) than SAVR ($35,002; 2.712 QALY).
  • The ICER for TAVR was $170,056/QALY, significantly exceeding China's per capita GDP.
  • Device cost was a key factor; TAVR becomes cost-effective if its price drops to $29,766.

Conclusions:

  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is currently not cost-effective in China.
  • A substantial cost reduction (approx. 65%) is necessary for TAVR to achieve cost-effectiveness in China.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management01:25

Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is when the aortic valve does not close or seal properly, leading to backward blood circulation from the aorta into the left ventricle during diastole. Common causes of AR include rheumatic heart disease, congenital valve defects, and aortic root dilation. Managing AR requires a multifaceted approach to alleviate symptoms, preserve left ventricular function, and address the underlying cause of the regurgitation. Patients with symptomatic AR or significant left...
39
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management01:26

Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

Mitral stenosis, a condition marked by the narrowing of the mitral valve, necessitates an integrated approach for effective management. This approach includes preventative measures, medical therapy, and surgical interventions to reduce symptoms and prevent complications.PreventionPrevention of mitral stenosis primarily focuses on reducing the incidence of bacterial infections, particularly streptococcal infections, which can lead to rheumatic fever and subsequent valvular damage. Timely...
20
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management01:25

Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is characterized by retrograde blood circulation from the left ventricle into the left atrium due to inadequate mitral valve closure. The severity of the condition, symptoms, and underlying cause determine treatment strategies.Monitoring and Pharmacological TreatmentPatients with mild to moderate MR typically do not need immediate intervention but regular monitoring to assess progression and guide treatment. Patients with mild MR should have an echocardiogram every 3-5...
27