Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Prognostic Impact of Blood Pressure Change Patterns on Patients With Aortic Dissection After Admission
Zhaoyu Wu1, Yixuan Li2,3,4, Peng Qiu1,2
1Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Insights
Blood pressure changes significantly impact aortic dissection prognosis. Patients with accelerating systolic blood pressure rises face higher adverse event risks, while decelerating drops indicate better outcomes within 24 hours.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Medical Statistics
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Hypertension is a primary risk factor for aortic dissection (AD).
- Effective blood pressure (BP) management is crucial for AD patient prognosis.
- The precise relationship between BP change patterns and AD outcomes remains incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of systolic blood pressure (SBP) change patterns on the prognosis of patients with aortic dissection.
- To identify specific SBP variation patterns associated with adverse events in AD patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 458 aortic dissection patients from two institutions (2004-2018).
- Functional data analysis (FDA) applied to categorize SBP change patterns (accelerating rise, accelerating drop, decelerating rise, decelerating drop).
- Survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier) used to assess the relationship between SBP patterns and adverse events (AEs).
Main Results:
- High SBP variation was associated with a significantly higher incidence of AEs compared to low SBP variation (35.84% vs. 20.35%).
- Patients exhibiting a decelerating SBP drop showed a significantly lower incidence of AEs at 15 and 20 minutes compared to those with an accelerating rise.
- No significant differences in AEs were observed among the four SBP pattern groups at later time points (25 and 30 minutes).
Conclusions:
- Aortic dissection patients can be categorized into four SBP change patterns within the first 30 minutes post-admission.
- Accelerating SBP rises correlate with the highest risk of AEs, whereas decelerating SBP drops suggest the best prognosis within 24 hours.
- Monitoring in-hospital SBP patterns offers valuable prognostic insights for clinicians managing AD.
Objectives:
Hypertension is a predominant risk factor for aortic dissection (AD), and blood pressure (BP) control plays a vital role in the management of AD. However, the correlation between BP change and the prognosis for AD remains unclear. This study aims to demonstrate the impact of BP change patterns on AD prognosis.
Methods:
This retrospective study included AD patients at two institutions (Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and the Vascular Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University) between 2004 and 2018. The systolic BP (SBP) change patterns of these patients were analyzed by functional data analysis (FDA). The relationship between BP change patterns and the risk of adverse events (AEs) was assessed using survival analysis.
Results:
A total of 458 patients with AD were eligible for analysis. The logistic regression analysis indicated that compared with that in patients with low SBP variation (SBPV), the incidence of AEs in patients with high SBPV was significantly higher (35.84 vs. 20.35%, OR 2.19, P < 0.001). The patients were divided into four categories (accelerating rise, accelerating drop, decelerating rise, and decelerating drop) based on their SBP patterns after FDA fitting. The results of Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that at the 15- and 20-min time points, the incidence of AEs in the decelerating-drop group was significantly lower than that in the accelerating-rise group (OR 0.19, P = 0.031 and OR 0.23, P = 0.050). However, at the 25- and 30-min time points, the difference between these four groups was not significant (OR 0.26, P = 0.08 and OR 0.29, P = 0.10).
Conclusions:
This study classified AD patients into four groups according to the SBP change patterns the first 30 min following admission, of which those with accelerating rises in SBP are at the highest risk of AEs, while those with decelerating drops have the best prognosis in the first 24 h after admission. Clinical practitioners may benefit from analyzing patterns of in-hospital SBP.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
06:51Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests