Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Impact of Financial Considerations on Willingness to Take Sacubitril/Valsartan for Heart Failure
Birju R Rao1, Candace D Speight1, Larry A Allen2
1Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA.
Insights
High out-of-pocket costs for sacubitril/valsartan significantly impact patient willingness to take this heart failure medication. Discussing finances before treatment increases patient acceptance.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Sacubitril/valsartan offers improved outcomes for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared to ACE inhibitors or ARBs.
- Higher out-of-pocket costs for sacubitril/valsartan present a barrier to its adoption.
- The influence of cost on treatment decisions and effective cost-integration strategies remain understudied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of out-of-pocket costs on patient willingness to initiate sacubitril/valsartan for HFrEF.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel cost-priming intervention in influencing treatment acceptance.
Main Methods:
- A survey of 1013 participants with self-reported heart disease was conducted using the Ipsos Knowledge Panel.
- Participants were randomized in a 3x2 factorial design to three cost conditions ($10, $50, $100/month) and either a control or cost-priming intervention.
- The cost-priming intervention involved financial situation inquiries before presenting drug benefits.
Main Results:
- Willingness to take sacubitril/valsartan decreased significantly with increasing cost: 85% at $10, 62% at $50, and 33% at $100 (P<0.0001).
- Patients were more likely to accept the drug at $10 vs $100 (OR, 14.3) and $50 vs $100 (OR, 3.6).
- The cost-priming group showed higher willingness to take the medication (63% vs 56%, P=0.04), with no significant interaction effect.
Conclusions:
- Out-of-pocket costs for sacubitril/valsartan can substantially influence patient adherence, even when medically indicated.
- A cost-priming intervention, prompting financial consideration before learning about benefits, enhances willingness to accept sacubitril/valsartan.
- Integrating cost considerations into patient decision-making may improve medication adherence for costly, high-benefit therapies.
Background:
Sacubitril/valsartan improves health outcomes for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction relative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, but it carries higher out-of-pocket costs. Neither the impact of cost nor how to integrate cost into medical decisions is well studied.
Methods And Results:
To evaluate the impact of out-of-pocket costs and a novel cost-priming intervention on willingness to take sacubitril/valsartan for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, participants with self-reported heart disease were surveyed using the online Ipsos Knowledge Panel. Participants were presented with a modified decision aid for sacubitril/valsartan and then, in a 3×2 factorial design, randomly assigned to 1 of 3 cost conditions ($10, $50, or $100/month) and to a control group or cost-priming intervention, defined by being asked questions about their financial situation before learning about the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan. Of the 1013 participants included in the analysis, 85% of respondents were willing to take sacubitril/valsartan at $10, 62% at $50, and 33% at $100 (P<0.0001). In a multivariable logistic regression model, participants were more likely to take sacubitril/valsartan at $10 versus $100 (odds ratio [OR], 14.3 [95% CI, 9.4-21.8]) and $50 compared with $100 (OR, 3.6 [95% CI, 2.5-5.1]). Overall, participants in the cost-primed group were more willing to take sacubitril/valsartan than those not primed to consider their financial situation (63% versus 56%, P=0.04). There was no statistically significant interaction between cost conditions and cost priming. Perceived benefit of sacubitril/valsartan over angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers decreased as cost increased but did not vary by cost priming.
Conclusions:
Commonly encountered out-of-pocket costs of sacubitril/valsartan may impact individuals' willingness to take the medication even when recommended by their physicians. Priming individuals to consider personal finances before learning about the drug increased willingness to take sacubitril/valsartan.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology

