Related Experiment Videos
Summary
Biomedical technology use in Brazilian maternity wards can perpetuate obstetric violence, despite national standards. Reviewing post-abortion care models is crucial to address systemic inequalities and improve women's well-being.
Area of Science:
- Medical Sociology
- Public Health
- Women's Health
Background:
- Brazilian legislation restricts abortion, leading to significant public health issues including morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations from unsafe abortions.
- Complications from induced abortions and miscarriages are managed in maternity wards, environments where obstetric violence may occur.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the intersection of biomedical technology practices with gynecological and obstetrical violence using ethnographic data.
- To understand how institutional practices in maternity settings contribute to violence against women seeking post-abortion care.
Main Methods:
- Ethnographic data collection within Brazilian maternity wards.
- Systematic analysis of three key practices: abortion complication treatment, ultrasound use, and curettage.
Main Results:
- Despite national and international standards, institutional resistance hinders the adoption of patient-centered care practices.
- The organization and materialization of ward practices, including the use and omission of specific technologies, perpetuate obstetric violence.
- Hospital practices reflect the moralization of abortion and broader societal inequalities related to economics, race, and gender.
Conclusions:
- Biomedical technology practices are symbolically and situationally shaped, potentially serving as tools for violence.
- The current model of post-abortion care requires review to mitigate the reproduction of obstetric violence.
- Addressing systemic inequalities is essential for improving care within and beyond institutional settings.