Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Non-equilibrium in the Cell01:16

Non-equilibrium in the Cell

4.8K
An important concept in studying metabolism and energy is that of chemical equilibrium. Most chemical reactions are reversible. They can proceed in both directions, releasing energy into their environment in one direction, and absorbing it from the environment in the other direction. The same is true for the chemical reactions involved in cell metabolism, such as the breaking down and building up of proteins into and from individual amino acids, respectively. Reactants within a closed system...
4.8K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.3K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.3K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

32.8K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.8K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.4K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.4K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.4K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.4K
Secondary Motives: Power Motivation and Achievement Motivation01:27

Secondary Motives: Power Motivation and Achievement Motivation

232
Power motivation and achievement motivation are two essential social motives identified by psychologist David McClelland. These motives influence behavior in various personal and professional contexts, shaping how individuals interact with others and pursue their goals.
Power motivation is characterized by the desire to influence, control, or have an impact on others. It is shaped by an individual's experiences, social environment, and cultural context. People with high power motivation are...
232

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social difference and relational coaching: finding new freedoms in working with identity.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same author

Coaching doctors to improve ethical decision-making in adult hospitalised patients potentially receiving excessive treatment: Study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Coaching during a crisis: Organizational coaches' praxis adaptation during the initial stages of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Human resource development quarterly·2023
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 7, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

Comparing artificial intelligence and human coaching goal attainment efficacy.

Nicky Terblanche1, Joanna Molyn2, Erik de Haan3,4

  • 1University of Stellenbosch Business School, Cape Town, South Africa.

Plos One
|June 21, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study compares the effectiveness of human coaches versus AI-powered chatbots in helping clients achieve their personal goals over a ten-month period. Researchers found that both methods significantly improved goal attainment compared to control groups, with AI performing just as well as human coaches. The findings suggest that while AI can democratize access to coaching, human coaches remain unique due to their emotional intelligence.

Keywords:
chatbot efficacylongitudinal trialprofessional developmenthuman-computer interaction

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

27.6K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 7, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

27.6K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial intelligence in professional development
  • Human-computer interaction within behavioral science

Background:

The history of machine learning is often characterized by excessive optimism and unrealistic projections. Despite this, automated systems are increasingly integrated into various sectors, including the rapidly expanding field of professional guidance. Prior research has shown that traditional mentoring is effective for diverse developmental outcomes. Specific applications of digital agents in restricted advisory domains have also demonstrated success. However, no prior work had resolved how these two distinct approaches compare in longitudinal settings. That uncertainty drove the need for a direct evaluation of their relative performance. This gap motivated a rigorous examination of goal achievement metrics over an extended timeframe. The current investigation addresses this ambiguity by contrasting human-led sessions with algorithmic alternatives.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of human-led coaching with AI-powered chatbot interventions. Researchers sought to resolve the uncertainty surrounding how these two distinct approaches perform in real-world settings. This investigation addresses the hype often associated with automated systems by providing empirical evidence of their impact. The team focused on measuring the increase in client goal attainment over a ten-month period. By conducting equivalent longitudinal trials, the authors intended to establish a clear performance benchmark. The motivation for this work stems from the rapid integration of digital tools into the helping professions. Understanding these differences is necessary to determine the appropriate application of technology in human development. This study provides a necessary evaluation of whether algorithmic guidance can truly match human-led support.

Main Methods:

The review approach involved analyzing two equivalent longitudinal randomized control trials conducted over a ten-month duration. Investigators assessed the increase in client progress resulting from either human-led or chatbot-based interventions. Both trials utilized standardized metrics to track the successful completion of personal objectives. The researchers compared these experimental groups against two separate control cohorts to establish baseline effectiveness. This methodology ensured that the performance of the digital agent was measured against a validated human standard. Data collection focused on the quantifiable outcomes of participants receiving consistent guidance. By replicating the study structure, the team minimized variables that could skew the comparative results. This systematic design provided a robust basis for evaluating the relative impact of each coaching modality.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature indicate that both human and AI-driven sessions were significantly more effective than the control groups. The primary outcome revealed that the AI chatbot achieved results comparable to human practitioners by the end of the ten-month period. This parity was observed despite the distinct nature of the two intervention types. The data demonstrates that automated systems can facilitate meaningful progress in client objectives. Both groups showed a measurable increase in success compared to those who did not receive any coaching. The study highlights that the digital agent performed as well as its human counterpart in this specific context. These results challenge previous assumptions about the limitations of non-human guidance in personal development. The evidence suggests that technology can serve as a viable alternative for achieving specific developmental milestones.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that automated guidance systems could be scaled to democratize access to professional development services. They suggest that the expansion of digital tools might paradoxically increase the overall market demand for human practitioners. The researchers argue that algorithms could potentially displace professionals who rely exclusively on simplistic, model-based techniques. It is noted that the current absence of empathy and emotional intelligence renders human practitioners unique. The study implies that understanding relative efficacy may encourage the strategic deployment of digital agents. This synthesis suggests that society could benefit from a focused integration of these technologies. The team asserts that human-led sessions remain distinct from automated counterparts due to inherent interpersonal qualities. These findings provide a framework for future discussions regarding the intersection of technology and personal growth.

The researchers observed that both human and AI-driven sessions significantly increased client goal attainment compared to control groups. Notably, the AI chatbot demonstrated effectiveness equivalent to human practitioners by the conclusion of the ten-month trial period.

The study utilized a longitudinal randomized control trial design. This approach allowed for the systematic measurement of progress over a ten-month duration, ensuring that both the human-led and the chatbot-led interventions were evaluated under equivalent conditions.

The authors interpret their findings through the lens of AI and goal theory. This theoretical framework helps explain why both interventions were successful in facilitating client progress during the study period.

The researchers highlight that AI currently lacks empathy and emotional intelligence. These specific human traits are identified as the primary factors that make human coaches difficult to replicate fully with existing technology.

The authors propose that AI might replace human coaches who utilize simplistic, model-based approaches. This suggests a potential shift in the professional landscape where technology handles standardized tasks while humans focus on more complex, emotionally nuanced interactions.

The researchers suggest that understanding the relative efficacy of these tools may promote focused use of technology. This strategic application is expected to provide significant benefits to society by balancing accessibility with high-quality support.