Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss

Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss

Though evaporation from plant leaves drives transpiration, it also results in loss of water. Because water is critical for photosynthetic reactions and other cellular processes, evolutionary pressures on plants in different environments have driven the acquisition of adaptations that reduce water loss.

Responses to Drought and Flooding

Responses to Drought and Flooding

Water plays a significant role in the life cycle of plants. However, insufficient or excess of water can be detrimental and pose a serious threat to plants.

Light Acquisition

Light Acquisition

In order to produce glucose, plants need to capture sufficient light energy. Many modern plants have evolved leaves specialized for light acquisition. Leaves can be only millimeters in width or tens of meters wide, depending on the environment. Due to competition for sunlight, evolution has driven the evolution of increasingly larger leaves and taller plants, to avoid shading by their neighbors with contaminant elaboration of root architecture and mechanisms to transport water and nutrients.

Responses to Heat and Cold Stress

Responses to Heat and Cold Stress

Every organism has an optimum temperature range within which healthy growth and physiological functioning can occur. At the ends of this range, there will be a minimum and maximum temperature that interrupt biological processes.

Responses to Salt Stress

Responses to Salt Stress

Salt stress—which can be triggered by high salt concentrations in a plant’s environment—can significantly affect plant growth and crop production by influencing photosynthesis and the absorption of water and nutrients.

C4 Pathway and CAM

C4 Pathway and CAM

Most plants use the C3 pathway for carbon fixation. However, some plants, such as sugar cane, corn, and cacti that grow in hot conditions, use alternative pathways to fix carbon and conserve energy loss due to photorespiration. Photorespiration is the process that occurs when the oxygen concentration is high. Under such conditions, the rubisco enzyme in the Calvin cycle binds O2 instead of CO2, which halts photosynthesis and consumes energy.
C4 Pathway
The C4 pathway is used by plants such as...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Environmental genomic selection to leverage polygenic local adaptation in barley landraces.

Communications biology·2025

Same author

Evaluating waterlogging stress response and recovery in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): an image-based phenotyping approach.

Plant methods·2024

Same author

Deciphering salt stress responses in Solanum pimpinellifolium through high-throughput phenotyping.

The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology·2024

Same author

Advancements in Imaging Sensors and AI for Plant Stress Detection: A Systematic Literature Review.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2024

Same author

Dataset of user interactions across four large pilots on the use of augmented reality in learning experiences.

Scientific data·2023

Same author

Flight Path Setting and Data Quality Assessments for Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicle-Based Photogrammetric Bridge Deck Documentation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Imaging and Analysis for Quantifying Maize (Zea mays) Abiotic Stress Phenotypes

Imaging and Analysis for Quantifying Maize (Zea mays) Abiotic Stress Phenotypes

Published on: March 28, 2025

Capturing crop adaptation to abiotic stress using image-based technologies.

Nadia Al-Tamimi¹, Patrick Langan¹, Villő Bernád¹

¹School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

|June 21, 2022

Summary

Advanced imaging techniques help breeders identify crop varieties resilient to environmental stresses like drought and salinity. This phenotyping approach quantifies plant responses, aiding in the selection of superior genotypes for improved crop yields.

Keywords:

abiotic stress crops high-throughput phenotyping imaging machine learning

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Unraveling Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses Using the PlantScreen Robotic Platform

Author Spotlight: Unraveling Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses Using the PlantScreen Robotic Platform

Published on: June 7, 2024

Author Spotlight: Advancing Stomatal Research with Automated Aperture Measurement

Author Spotlight: Advancing Stomatal Research with Automated Aperture Measurement

Published on: February 9, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Imaging and Analysis for Quantifying Maize (Zea mays) Abiotic Stress Phenotypes

Imaging and Analysis for Quantifying Maize (Zea mays) Abiotic Stress Phenotypes

Published on: March 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unraveling Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses Using the PlantScreen Robotic Platform

Author Spotlight: Unraveling Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses Using the PlantScreen Robotic Platform

Published on: June 7, 2024

Author Spotlight: Advancing Stomatal Research with Automated Aperture Measurement

Author Spotlight: Advancing Stomatal Research with Automated Aperture Measurement

Published on: February 9, 2024

Area of Science:

Plant Science
Agricultural Science
Biotechnology

Background:

Farmers and breeders seek to enhance crop resilience to abiotic stresses for stable yields.
Phenotyping is crucial for quantifying crop responses to environmental challenges.
Modern imaging technologies offer non-destructive, time-series data for dissecting plant stress responses.

Purpose of the Study:

To review phenotyping imaging technologies for assessing abiotic stress tolerance in crops.
To discuss traits quantified by imaging sensors and their relevance to stress resilience.
To compile spectral tolerance indices and explore machine learning applications in crop phenotyping.

Main Methods:

Review of imaging technologies: RGB, multispectral, and hyperspectral sensors.
Analysis of traits related to abiotic tolerance (salinity, drought, nitrogen deficiency).
Examination of high-throughput phenotyping facilities and field-based unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) applications.
Compilation of spectral tolerance indices and machine learning models (supervised, unsupervised, deep learning).

Main Results:

Imaging technologies enable non-destructive quantification of crop physiological data over time.
Various sensors effectively assess crop responses to salinity, drought, and nitrogen deficiency.
Key traits for abiotic tolerance have been identified and quantified using imaging.
Machine learning shows promise for analyzing complex phenotyping data.

Conclusions:

Image-based phenotyping is a powerful tool for improving crop abiotic stress tolerance.
Integration of advanced sensors and machine learning accelerates the development of resilient crop varieties.
Continued research in phenotyping and data analysis is vital for global food security.