Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.1K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.1K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.6K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.6K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

964
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
964
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

875
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
875
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

78.2K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
78.2K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

6.5K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
6.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robust Bayesian multilevel meta-analysis: Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of dependent effect sizes.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Continuous outcome estimation in N-of-1 trials for accelerated decision-making.

Epilepsia·2026
Same author

A tutorial on Bayesian hypothesis testing of correlation coefficients using the BFpack-module in JASP.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Truncating the likelihood allows outlier exclusion without overestimating the evidence in the Bayes factor t test.

Psychological methods·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K

Making Sense of Uncertainty in the Science Classroom: A Bayesian Approach.

Joshua M Rosenberg1, Marcus Kubsch2, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers3

  • 1University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1122 Volunteer Blvd, TN 37996 Knoxville, USA.

Science & Education
|June 22, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Bayesian approaches help science learners understand uncertainty, fostering trust in scientific knowledge. This method addresses the public

More Related Videos

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.3K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.3K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Science Education
  • Statistics
  • Child Development

Background:

  • Scientific knowledge is often presented as certain, contrasting with its inherent uncertainty.
  • This can lead to public distrust when scientific understanding evolves, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To argue for a Bayesian approach to help science learners understand and accept scientific uncertainty.
  • To provide practical methods for integrating Bayesian reasoning into K-12 science education.

Main Methods:

  • Drawing on research from statistics, child development, and science education.
  • Introducing Bayes' theorem and its principles.
  • Describing three practical applications for K-12 settings: conceptual understanding, a web-based tool (Confidence Updater), and pedagogical strategies for young learners.

Main Results:

  • A Bayesian perspective can support learners in making sense of uncertainty in science.
  • Three practical methods are proposed for implementing Bayesian reasoning in educational contexts.
  • The Confidence Updater web application can simplify Bayesian calculations.

Conclusions:

  • Viewing science and knowledge through a Bayesian lens can enhance trust in science.
  • Further research is needed to explore the full potential of Bayesian approaches in science education.
  • Integrating Bayesian reasoning can help bridge the gap between scientific uncertainty and public perception.