Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
[Informed consent in shared processes].
Álvaro Sanz1, Francisco Barón2, María Luisa Del Valle3
1Hospital Universitario del Río Hortega. Calle Dulzaina 1, 47013 Valladolid asrubiales@hotmail.com.
This paper discusses how informed consent should be obtained when multiple specialists are involved in a patient's care. It argues that the doctor who performs the procedure should provide detailed information and obtain consent. The doctor who requests the procedure should explain why it is needed and get a basic verbal agreement. Both should work together to ensure the patient understands the process. Recording this information in the medical record is also recommended. The study highlights the importance of teamwork in patient care and clarifies roles in shared processes.
Area of Science:
- Medical ethics and patient communication
- Healthcare interdisciplinary collaboration
- Clinical decision-making processes
Background:
Modern medical practice increasingly involves multiple specialists working together. While specialization improves expertise, shared care processes raise questions about who should obtain informed consent. Existing knowledge shows that informed consent is a legal and ethical requirement. However, uncertainty remains about responsibility in interdisciplinary settings. Prior research has shown that consent is typically obtained by the performing physician. This paper addresses a gap in understanding how shared processes affect consent procedures. No prior work had resolved the debate between performing and requesting physicians. That uncertainty drove the need to clarify roles in shared care scenarios. This paper examines the ethical and practical implications of shared consent processes. It highlights the importance of defining responsibilities in multidisciplinary care.
Purpose Of The Study:
This paper aims to clarify the roles of different professionals in obtaining informed consent during shared medical processes. It seeks to resolve a debate about whether the performing physician or the requesting physician should obtain consent. The study focuses on the ethical implications of shared care processes. It explores how responsibilities are distributed in multidisciplinary settings. The authors aim to provide guidance for healthcare teams. They examine the legal and practical aspects of consent. The study addresses the need for clear communication in shared care. It proposes a framework for collaborative consent practices.
Main Methods:
The authors use a conceptual analysis to explore informed consent in shared processes. They examine the roles of different professionals in multidisciplinary care. The study draws on ethical principles and legal standards. It considers the responsibilities of performing and requesting physicians. The analysis includes a review of clinical scenarios. The authors evaluate the risks and benefits of different approaches. They propose a model for shared consent procedures. The study emphasizes the importance of teamwork in patient care.
Main Results:
The study finds that the performing physician should obtain informed consent. This is because they have the most detailed knowledge of the procedure. The requesting physician should provide basic information about the procedure. They should explain the reason for the indication and obtain a pre-consent. Both physicians should collaborate in the consent process. The study suggests that a shared approach improves patient understanding. It recommends recording pre-consent in the medical record. The findings emphasize the importance of teamwork in obtaining consent.
Conclusions:
The authors conclude that informed consent in shared processes requires collaboration between physicians. The performing physician is responsible for detailed information and consent. The requesting physician should provide basic information and obtain pre-consent. This approach ensures that patients receive comprehensive information. The study emphasizes the importance of teamwork in patient care. It suggests that shared consent processes improve communication. The authors recommend recording pre-consent in the medical record. Their findings highlight the need for clear roles in multidisciplinary care.
Frequently Asked Questions
The performing physician should obtain informed consent, as they have the most detailed knowledge of the procedure.
The requesting physician should provide basic information about the procedure and obtain a pre-consent.
Recording pre-consent ensures that the patient's acceptance is documented and available for the care team.
Shared consent ensures that patients receive comprehensive information from both the requesting and performing physicians.
Pre-consent is a prior verbal agreement, while informed consent is a detailed agreement after full information is provided.
The authors emphasize teamwork, patient understanding, and clear communication in shared care processes.
Related Concept Videos
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
Ethics in Research
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Ethical Dilemmas II

