Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2025

10:10
Observing Mitotic Division and Dynamics in a Live Zebrafish Embryo
Published on: July 15, 2016
12.2K
Ablation of cDC2 development by triple mutations within the Zeb2 enhancer
Tian-Tian Liu1, Sunkyung Kim1, Pritesh Desai2
1Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Nature
|June 22, 2022
Summary
The study reveals transcription factors NFIL3 and C/EBPs compete at the Zeb2 enhancer to control dendritic cell progenitor divergence. This competition is crucial for specifying type 2 dendritic cells (cDC2s) and their role in T helper 2 cell responses.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Developmental Biology
- Transcriptional Regulation
Background:
- The differentiation pathways of common dendritic cell progenitors (CDPs) into cDC1 and cDC2 lineages are not fully understood.
- While transcription factors like BATF3 are known to stabilize later stages of cDC1 commitment, the initial mechanisms driving CDP divergence remain elusive.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate the transcriptional mechanisms governing the divergence of common dendritic cell progenitors (CDPs).
- To identify the initial requirements for the specification of pre-cDC2 cells.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of NFIL3 reporter mice to track NFIL3 expression dynamics.
- CUT&RUN and ChIP-seq to identify endogenous NFIL3 binding sites.
- CRISPR-Cas9 mediated in vivo mutational analysis of identified regulatory elements.
- Assessment of dendritic cell development and T helper 2 cell responses in mutant mice.
Main Results:
- NFIL3 transiently binds to the Zeb2 enhancer, where it competes with C/EBPα and C/EBPβ.
- NFIL3 acts as a repressor, while C/EBPs act as supporters of Zeb2 expression at these sites.
- Disruption of NFIL3-C/EBP binding sites leads to loss of Zeb2 expression in myeloid progenitors.
- This results in a complete failure of pre-cDC2 specification and mature cDC2 development, impairing T helper 2 responses.
Conclusions:
- CDP divergence into cDC1 and cDC2 lineages is regulated by a competitive mechanism at the Zeb2 enhancer involving NFIL3 and C/EBPs.
- This regulatory axis is essential for the development of cDC2s and their function in orchestrating T helper 2 immune responses.
Related Concept Videos
Separation of Sister Chromatids
3.8K
At the transition from prophase to metaphase, there is a reduction in cohesion along the chromosomal arms, resulting in the resolution of sister chromatids. However, residual cohesin connections remain to hold the sister chromatids together until the transition from metaphase to anaphase. The residual connection prevents any premature separation of sister chromatids, blocking the risks of aneuploidy within the daughter cells.
At the onset of anaphase, separase, a proteolytic enzyme, is...
At the onset of anaphase, separase, a proteolytic enzyme, is...
3.8K
Anaphase Promoting Complex
2.9K
The stepwise destruction of specific proteins is necessary for the progression and completion of the cell cycle. Such proteins are ubiquitinated by ubiquitin ligases and then subsequently destroyed by the proteasome. The SCF (Skp1/Cullin/F-box) and the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) are two important ubiquitin ligases involved in cell cycle progression. While SCF is active throughout the cell cycle, APC gets activated during metaphase to anaphase transition. Cdc20 or Cdh1 binds to APC and...
2.9K

