Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2025

High-throughput Quantitative Real-time RT-PCR Assay for Determining Expression Profiles of Types I and III Interferon Subtypes
Published on: March 24, 2015
Dynamics of Type I and Type II Interferon Signature Determines Responsiveness to Anti-TNF Therapy in Rheumatoid
Takeshi Iwasaki1,2, Ryu Watanabe3,4, Hiromu Ito3,5
1Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Abstract:
The factors influencing long-term responses to a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients currently remain unknown. Therefore, we herein conducted a multi-omics analysis of TNFi responses in a Japanese RA cohort. Blood samples were collected from 27 biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive RA patients at the initiation of and after three months of treatment with TNFi. Treatment responses were evaluated at one year. Differences in gene expression levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), plasma protein levels, drug concentrations, and the presence/absence of anti-drug antibodies were investigated, and a cell phenotypic analysis of PBMCs was performed using flow cytometry. After one year of treatment, thirteen patients achieved clinical remission (responders), while the others did not or switched to other biologics (non-responders). Differentially expressed genes related to treatment responses were enriched for the interferon (IFN) pathway. The expression of type I IFN signaling-related genes was higher in non-responders than in responders before and after treatment (P = 0.03, 0.005, respectively). The expression of type II IFN signaling-related genes did not significantly differ before treatment; however, it increased in non-responders and decreased in responders, with a significant difference being observed after three months of treatment (P = 1.2×10-3). The total number of lymphocytes and C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 10 (CXCL10) protein levels were associated with the type I IFN signature (P = 6.7×10-7, 6.4×10-3, respectively). Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) protein levels before treatment predicted fold increases in type II IFN (P = 0.03). These IFN signature-related indices (the number of lymphocytes, CXCL10, and HGF) significantly differed between responders and non-responders (P = 0.01, 0.01, and 0.04, respectively). A single-cell analysis revealed that the type I IFN signature was more highly enriched in monocytes than in other cell types. A deconvolution analysis of bulk-RNA sequence data identified CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as the main sources of the type II IFN signature in non-responders. Collectively, the present results demonstrated that the dynamics of the type I and II IFN pathways affected long-term responses to TNFi, providing information on its biological background and potential for clinical applications.
More Related Videos
08:26Development and Validation of an Ultrasensitive Single Molecule Array Digital Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for Human Interferon-α
Published on: June 14, 2018
08:09Vasodilation of Isolated Vessels and the Isolation of the Extracellular Matrix of Tight-skin Mice
Published on: March 24, 2017
Related Concept Videos
T Cell Types and Functions
Th1 cells stimulate dendritic cells to express necessary co-stimulatory molecules on their surfaces for...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway
Inflammatory Response
Inflammation can be triggered by various stimuli, such as impact, abrasion, chemical irritation, infections, and extreme hot or cold temperatures. These can damage cells and connective tissue fibers,...
NF-κB-dependent Signaling Pathway
NF-κB-dependent Signaling Mechanism
The...
TGF - β Signaling Pathway