Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
Published on: April 16, 2014
The Riemannian Geometry Theory of Visually-Guided Movement Accounts for Afterimage Illusions and Size Constancy
Peter D Neilson1, Megan D Neilson2, Robin T Bye3
1School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Our Riemannian formulation explains size constancy, showing vergence doesn't affect perceived size. A new network models visual-somatosensory-hippocampal associations to explain afterimage illusions with body movement.
Area of Science:
- Visual perception
- Computational neuroscience
- Geometric vision
Background:
- Previous work suggested vergence affects perceived size.
- Size constancy is a fundamental aspect of visual perception.
- Afterimage experiments provide insights into visual processing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explain why vergence does not affect perceived size using a Riemannian framework.
- To account for size-change illusions related to afterimages and body movement.
- To propose a Riemannian visual-somatosensory-hippocampal association memory network.
Main Methods:
- Developing a Riemannian formulation of visual space.
- Utilizing a novel association memory network incorporating a Riemannian metric.
- Analyzing afterimage experiments, including the Taylor illusion.
- Connecting visual perception with somatosensory information and proprioception.
Main Results:
- The Riemannian formulation accurately explains why vergence does not influence perceived size.
- The proposed network emulates the warping of 3D visual space by the eye.
- The network predicts changes in retinal image size based on object distance.
- The model successfully accounts for size-change illusions occurring with moving afterimages.
Conclusions:
- The Riemannian metric is crucial for accurately emulating visual space distortions.
- The association memory network provides a mechanism for size constancy.
- Discrepancies between anticipated and actual retinal image sizes explain size-change illusions.
More Related Videos
09:46MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
Published on: May 10, 2012
07:45Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
Published on: July 21, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Gestalt Principles of Perception
Perceptual Constancy
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components
As the car advances, its position evolves over time. Quantifying the car's velocity involves computing the...
Space-Time Curvature and the General Theory of Relativity
This has been verified in many experiments. However, space and time are no longer absolute. Two observers moving relative to one another do not agree on the length of objects or the passage of time. The mechanics of objects based on Newton's laws of...
Focusing of Light in the Eye