Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.5K
Nature, Data, and Power: How Hegemonies Shaped This Special Section.
The American Naturalist
|June 23, 2022
Summary
This study bridges scientific fields like ecology and genetics with social science critiques to address systemic oppression in science. It reflects on an experiment to confront past harms and build a more equitable scientific future.
Area of Science:
- Integrates ecology, evolution, behavior, and genetics with critical social science and humanities perspectives.
Background:
- Acknowledges how systems of oppression (racism, colonialism, misogyny, etc.) have historically influenced scientific content and practices.
- Highlights the limited opportunities within academic science to address these influences, despite developed critiques in other fields.
Purpose of the Study:
- To foster cross-disciplinary conversations between natural sciences and critical social sciences within a scientific journal.
- To confront historical harms perpetuated in the name of science and explore alternative, more equitable scientific approaches.
Main Methods:
- Introduction to a special journal section featuring cross-disciplinary dialogue.
- Reflection on the process of conducting an "experiment" in interdisciplinary engagement.
Main Results:
- Facilitated a dialogue between natural sciences and critical social sciences.
- Provided a platform for confronting and reflecting on the impact of systemic oppression in science.
Conclusions:
- Cross-disciplinary engagement is crucial for addressing systemic oppression in science.
- Reflecting on past harms is essential for envisioning and creating more equitable scientific futures.
Related Concept Videos
Group Polarization
35.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.4K
Keystone Species
22.1K
Measures of species biodiversity, such as richness (i.e., the number of species present) and evenness (i.e., their relative abundance), describe an ecological community’s structure. Many factors affect community structure, including abiotic factors (e.g., sunlight and nutrients), disturbances (e.g., fire or flood), species interactions (e.g., predation or competition), and chance events (e.g., foreign species invasion). Certain species—such as keystone species—also play a...
22.1K
Relationship Formation
41.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
41.0K
In- and Out-Groups
39.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.9K
Symbiosis
30.2K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
30.2K
Social Traps
23.2K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
23.2K

