Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Success rates for US and Canadian anticancer drug development efforts in pediatric oncology
Elisabeth Oliviero1, Georgiana Kourkopoulos1, Jonathan Kimmelman1
1Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Background:
Approximately 5% of adult cancer interventions put into clinical testing attain regulatory approval. Little is known about corresponding rates for pediatric cancer.
Methods:
Our primary outcomes were the proportion of interventions graduating to the next trial phase, randomized trials, and/or clinical practice. We created a saturation sample of clinical trials by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for all pediatric anticancer trials in the United States or Canada. Trial characteristics were extracted automatically from ClinicalTrials.gov records, and cancer indication/drug class categorization, biomarker enrichment, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval status at time of recruitment were double-extracted from each record. Regulatory approval status and labeling modifications for each intervention were determined by searching Drugs@FDA and the New Pediatric Labeling Information Database.
Results:
Five hundred eighty-nine pediatric trials launched between 1987 and 2019 were captured. The overall probability of graduation was 17.0%; 18.9% of interventions graduated from phase 1 to phase 2 trials, and 1.6% of interventions graduated from phase 2 to phase 3 trials. The proportion of interventions advancing from phase 1 to FDA approval was 3.6%, and 1.9% of interventions tested in phase 1 advanced to a randomized phase 2 trial. Only biomarker enrichment was significantly predictive of graduation from phase 1 to phase 2 trials (p = .011).
Conclusion:
The proportion of interventions advancing from phase 1 testing to FDA approval was similar to estimates for adult oncology. Our findings highlight the challenges for current paradigms of pediatric anticancer drug development.
Insights
Pediatric cancer drug development shows a 3.6% success rate from phase 1 to FDA approval, similar to adults. These findings reveal significant challenges in developing new pediatric cancer treatments.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Drug Development
Background:
- Adult cancer interventions have a 5% regulatory approval rate.
- Pediatric cancer intervention approval rates are largely unknown.
- Pediatric cancer drug development faces unique challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the success rates of pediatric anticancer interventions in clinical trials.
- To compare pediatric cancer drug development success rates to adult oncology.
- To identify factors influencing pediatric cancer trial progression.
Main Methods:
- A saturation sample of 589 pediatric anticancer trials in the US and Canada (1987-2019) was analyzed.
- Trial data, including biomarker enrichment and FDA approval status, were extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov.
- Regulatory approval and labeling modifications were verified using Drugs@FDA and the New Pediatric Labeling Information Database.
Main Results:
- The overall probability of trial graduation was 17.0%.
- 3.6% of phase 1 interventions reached FDA approval; 1.9% advanced to randomized phase 2 trials.
- Biomarker enrichment was the only significant predictor of phase 1 to phase 2 trial graduation (p=0.011).
Conclusions:
- The proportion of pediatric cancer interventions reaching FDA approval from phase 1 is comparable to adult oncology.
- Current pediatric anticancer drug development paradigms face considerable challenges.
- Further research is needed to optimize pediatric cancer drug development pathways.
More Related Videos
10:49Pre-clinical Evaluation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Leukemia
Published on: September 18, 2013
15:04Potentiation of Anticancer Antibody Efficacy by Antineoplastic Drugs: Detection of Antibody-drug Synergism Using the Combination Index Equation
Published on: January 19, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Clinical Trials: Overview
Cancer Survival Analysis
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...