Therapeutic Vulnerability to ATR Inhibition in Concurrent NF1 and ATRX-Deficient/ALT-Positive High-Grade Solid Tumors

Ming Yuan1, Charles G Eberhart1, Christine A Pratilas2,3

  • 1Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Cancers
|June 24, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Targeting the ATR pathway shows promise for Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1)-associated tumors with ATRX mutations. ATR inhibitors sensitized specific NF1-deficient glioblastoma and MPNST cells, suggesting a new therapeutic strategy.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1)-associated solid tumors frequently exhibit ATRX mutations and alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT).
  • Understanding the combined effects of NF1 and ATRX deficiency in malignant solid tumors is crucial for developing targeted therapies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the phenotypic consequences of combined NF1 and ATRX deficiency in malignant solid tumors.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of ATR inhibitors, alone or in combination with MEK inhibitors or temozolomide, in NF1-deficient and associated tumor models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized cell lines from NF1-deficient glioblastomas, an NF1-associated ATRX mutant glioblastoma, an NF1-derived sarcoma, and NF1-deficient malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) lines.
  • Treated cancer cells with ATR inhibitors, with or without MEK inhibitors or temozolomide.
  • Performed ATRX knockout (KO) and TERC KO, or ATRX knockdown, in specific cell lines to assess their impact on drug sensitivity.

Main Results:

  • Combined ATRX and TERC KO induced ALT-like properties and sensitized U251 glioma cells to ATR inhibition in vitro and in vivo.
  • ATR inhibitors sensitized U251 cells to temozolomide, but not MEK inhibition, regardless of ATRX levels.
  • The NF1-associated ATRX mutant glioblastoma cell line (JHH-NF1-GBM1) and one MPNST cell line (NF90.8) showed sensitivity to ATR inhibition under specific genetic modifications.

Conclusions:

  • Targeting the ATR pathway is a feasible therapeutic strategy for a subset of NF1-deficient and associated solid tumors.
  • The study highlights the differential sensitivity of various NF1-associated tumor types to ATR inhibition and combination therapies.