Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Octopus Mastopexy: A True "Implant-First" and On-Demand Approach Based on Parenchymal Reduction.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
Same author

Multimodal assessment of the skin biomechanical properties during wound healing and hyaluronic acid response.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials·2026
Same author

Five keypoints in Foucher flap planning and harvesting: Retrospective case series study and literature review.

JPRAS open·2026
Same author

Prosthetic nipple areola complex reconstruction after breast reduction: a case report.

Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery·2026
Same author

Micrografts-a novel ally in hard-to-heal wounds: a systematic review.

Journal of wound care·2026
Same author

Reply: Temporal Modified Orbicularis Repositioning: Going beyond the Limits of Temporal Lifting.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations for the Appropriate Use of Diagnostic Tests in Pediatric Allergology: Focus on Asthma, Rhinoconjunctivitis, and Keratoconjunctivitis Vernal.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same journal

Surgical and Transcatheter Approach of a Failed Mitral Valve Repair: A Comprehensive Review on Selecting the Most Suitable Approach.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same journal

Hybrid Metaheuristic Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Detection in Digital Mammography: A Feasibility Study with Nested Validation, Benchmarking, and External Stress Testing.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same journal

Identity Transformation and the Role of Accountability in Recovery from Problematic Pornography Use: A Phenomenological-Hermeneutical Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same journal

Does Early Surgical Treatment in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Have a Favorable Clinical Outcome and Impact on Quality of Life?

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same journal

Shear Wave Elastography in Musculoskeletal Imaging: A Narrative Review.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

6.7K

Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A

Simone La Padula1,2, Rosita Pensato1, Francesco D'Andrea1

  • 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Università Degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy.

Journal of Clinical Medicine
|June 24, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study found that 3D breast augmentation simulations using Arbrea software are highly realistic and satisfying for patients, accurately predicting breast volume but with less precision for shape. Patient satisfaction with both simulations and surgical outcomes was high.

Keywords:
3D simulationBREAST-Qassessment scaleaugmented realitybreast augmentation outcome assessmentbreast augmentation simulationbreast implants

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility
07:46

Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility

Published on: August 9, 2024

842
Combining Augmented Reality and 3D Printing to Display Patient Models on a Smartphone
09:26

Combining Augmented Reality and 3D Printing to Display Patient Models on a Smartphone

Published on: January 2, 2020

18.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

6.7K
Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility
07:46

Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility

Published on: August 9, 2024

842
Combining Augmented Reality and 3D Printing to Display Patient Models on a Smartphone
09:26

Combining Augmented Reality and 3D Printing to Display Patient Models on a Smartphone

Published on: January 2, 2020

18.5K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Medical Simulation
  • Aesthetic Medicine

Background:

  • Breast augmentation is a common plastic surgery procedure.
  • 3D simulations enhance pre-operative planning and patient expectation management.
  • Objective evidence comparing 3D simulations to actual outcomes is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the aesthetic similarity between Arbrea 3D breast augmentation simulations and one-year post-operative results.
  • To assess patient satisfaction with pre-operative 3D simulations and surgical outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study involving patients undergoing breast augmentation.
  • Patients rated simulation realism using a custom scale.
  • Patient satisfaction assessed via Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and BREAST-Q Augmentation Module.

Main Results:

  • Patients reported high satisfaction with simulations (mean VAS 8.2 ± 1.2) and surgical outcomes.
  • Simulations accurately represented attained breast volume.
  • Statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) were noted between pre-operative simulations and one-year post-operative BREAST-Q assessments, particularly in shape.

Conclusions:

  • Arbrea 3D software provides a highly satisfying pre-operative simulation for breast augmentation patients.
  • While volume simulation is very accurate, patients should be informed that breast shape correspondence is not absolute.
  • 3D simulation is a valuable tool for patient satisfaction and expectation management in breast augmentation.