Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

A Uniaxial Compression Experiment with CO2-Bearing Coal Using a Visualized and Constant-Volume Gas-Solid Coupling Test System
Published on: June 12, 2019
Prediction of Strength and CBR Characteristics of Chemically Stabilized Coal Gangue: ANN and Random Forest Tree
Muhammad Nasir Amin1, Mudassir Iqbal2,3, Mohammed Ashfaq4
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract:
Coal mining waste in the form of coal gangue (CG) was established recently as a potential fill material in earthworks. To ascertain this potential, this study forecasts the strength and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) characteristics of chemically stabilized CG by deploying two widely used artificial intelligence approaches, i.e., artificial neural network (ANN) and random forest (RF) regression. In this research work, varied dosage levels of lime (2, 4, and 6%) and gypsum (0.5, 1, and 1.5%) were employed for determining the unconfined compression strength (UCS) and CBR of stabilized CG mixes. An experimental study comprising 384 datasets was conducted and the resulting database was used to develop the ANN and RF regression models. Lime content, gypsum dosage, and 28 d curing period were considered as three input attributes in obtaining three outputs (i.e., UCS, unsoaked CBR, and soaked CBR). While modelling with the ANN technique, different algorithms, hidden layers, and the number of neurons were studied while selecting the optimum model. In the case of RF regression modelling, optimal grid comprising maximal depth of tree, number of trees, confidence, random splits, enabled parallel execution, and guess subset ratio were investigated, alongside the variable number of folds, to obtain the best model. The optimum models obtained using the ANN approach manifested relatively better performance in terms of correlation coefficient values, equaling 0.993, 0.995, and 0.997 for UCS, unsoaked CBR and soaked CBR, respectively. Additionally, the MAE values were observed as 45.98 kPa, 1.41%, and 1.18% for UCS, unsoaked CBR, and soaked CBR, respectively. The models were also validated using 2-stage validation processes. In the first stage of validation of the model (using unseen 30% of the data), it was revealed that reliable performance of the models was attained, whereas in the second stage (parametric analysis), results were achieved which are corroborated with those in existing literature.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Classification of Elements and Compounds
Compounds are pure substances composed of two or more elements in fixed, definite proportions. Compounds are classified as ionic or molecular (covalent) based on the bonds...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

