A systematic review evaluating metacognitive beliefs in health anxiety and somatic distress
Edwina Keen1,2, Maria Kangas1,2, Philippe T Gilchrist1,2
1School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Purpose:
Increasing evidence suggests metacognitive beliefs may underpin transdiagnostic mechanisms maintaining psychopathology. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate published studies investigating the role of metacognitive beliefs in somatic distress in adult samples.
Method:
A systematic review was conducted, spanning five data bases. Studies meeting eligibility criteria were qualitatively synthesized.
Results:
Thirty-six studies (N = 12,390) met inclusion criteria with results suggesting a relatively consistent positive relationship between metacognitive beliefs and somatic distress. Both general and syndrome-specific metacognitive beliefs demonstrated relationships with not only emotional distress, but also physical symptoms themselves.
Conclusions:
Results are discussed in terms of conceptualizing somatic distress through the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF) Model. Future research into metacognitive therapy for somatic populations is recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Anxiety: Overview
Individuals with anxiety often experience a range of physical and emotional symptoms, including sweating, trembling, tachycardia, and disturbances in sleep patterns. These symptoms vary in intensity and frequency but are generally disruptive and distressing.
Metacognition
Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Cognitive Therapy
Self-Schemas


