Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: May 10, 2022
Cost-effectiveness of three internet-based interventions for eating disorders: A randomized controlled trial
Pieter J Rohrbach1,2, Alexandra E Dingemans1, Eric F van Furth1,2
1GGZ Rivierduinen Eetstoornissen Ursula, Leiden, Netherlands.
The online self-help program Featback was cost-effective for treating eating disorders, showing potential to reduce healthcare costs and reach more patients. This internet-based intervention may benefit individuals and society by offering accessible and affordable care.
Area of Science:
- Mental Health
- Health Economics
- Digital Health
Background:
- Eating disorders affect individuals of all ages, with many not receiving adequate treatment.
- Internet-based interventions offer a scalable solution to increase treatment accessibility.
- Economic evaluations are crucial for understanding the value of digital health interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of an internet-based self-help program (Featback) compared to expert-patient support and usual care for eating disorders.
- To evaluate the societal costs and quality-of-life adjusted life years (QALYs) of different intervention strategies.
- To determine the probability of cost-effectiveness for each intervention at various willingness-to-pay thresholds.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial with 4 arms: Featback (unguided online self-help), expert-patient support, Featback plus support, and care-as-usual.
- Societal economic evaluation alongside the trial, measuring costs and QALYs over 12 months.
- Analysis included cost-utility acceptability curves to assess the probability of cost-effectiveness.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in QALYs or costs were found between groups, though Featback conditions showed a slight QALY advantage.
- The Featback-only condition incurred the lowest societal costs (€16,741) compared to care-as-usual (€28,479).
- Featback-only demonstrated the highest probability of being cost-effective across all willingness-to-pay values.
Conclusions:
- Internet-based interventions like Featback are likely cost-effective for eating disorders.
- Scalable digital health solutions can potentially reduce healthcare costs and reach underserved populations.
- Implementing Featback may offer significant benefits to both individuals with eating disorders and society.
Related Concept Videos
Binge Eating Disorders
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Treatment Strategies for Psychological Disorders
Psychological therapies focus on modifying emotions, thoughts, and behaviors through talking, interpreting, listening, rewarding, challenging, and modeling. Clinical psychologists, counselors, and social workers commonly practice psychotherapy. Clinical...
Bulimia Nervosa
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...

