Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Removal of Arsenic Using a Cationic Polymer Gel Impregnated with Iron Hydroxide
Published on: June 28, 2019
Adsorption and desorption behavior of arsenite and arsenate at river sediment-water interface
Kien Thanh Nguyen1, Amir Hossein Navidpour1, Mohammad Boshir Ahmed2
1Centre for Green Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Abstract:
The adsorption of inorganic arsenic (As) plays an important role in the mobility and transport of As in the river environment. In this work, the adsorption and desorption of arsenite [As(III)] and arsenate [As(V)] on river sediment were conducted under different pH, initial As concentrations, river water and sediment composition to assess As adsorption behavior and mechanism. Both adsorption kinetics and equilibrium results showed higher adsorption capacity of sediment for As(V) than As(III). Adsorption of As(III) and As(V) on river sediment was favored in acidic to neutral conditions and on finer sediment particles, while sediment organic matter marginally reduced adsorption capacity. In addition, higher adsorption affinity of As(III) and As(V) in river sediment was observed in deionised water than in river water. For the release process, the desorption of both As(III) and As(V) followed nonlinear kinetic models well, showing higher amount of As(III) release from sediment than As(V). Adsorption isotherm was well described by both Langmuir and Freundlich models, demonstrating higher maximum adsorption capacity of As(V) at 298.7 mg/kg than As(III) at 263.3 mg/kg in deionised water, and higher maximum adsorption capacity of As(III) of 234.3 mg/kg than As(V) of 206.2 mg/kg in river water. The XRD showed the changes in the peaks of mineral groups of sediment whilst FTIR results revealed the changes related to surface functional groups before and after adsorption, indicating that Fe-O/Fe-OH, Si(Al)-O, hydroxyl and carboxyl functional groups were predominantly involved in As(III) and As(V) adsorption on sediment surface. XPS analysis evidenced the transformation between these As species in river sediment after adsorption, whilst SEM-EDS revealed higher amount of As(V) in river sediment than As(III) due to the lower signal of Al.
More Related Videos
06:52Experimental Column Setup for Studying Anaerobic Biogeochemical Interactions Between Iron OxyHydroxides, Trace Elements, and Bacteria
Published on: December 19, 2017
08:34A Dual-Functional Electroactive Filter Towards Simultaneously SbIII Oxidation and Sequestration
Published on: December 5, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Solubility
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Precipitation of Ions
The equation that describes the equilibrium between solid calcium carbonate and its solvated ions is:
Ionic Strength: Effects on Chemical Equilibria
In this solution, the primary...
Common Ion Effect
Extraction: Advanced Methods