Primary vs patch-based skin closure for in-utero spina bifida repair
M Fishel Bartal1, E P Bergh1, K Tsao2
1The Fetal Center, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Objective:
During in-utero spina bifida (SB) repair, closure of large defects is often challenging, requiring tissue graft for watertight skin closure. No prior studies have compared primary skin closure vs patch-based repair. Our objective was to compare neonatal and 1-year outcomes associated with these two types of skin closure for in-utero SB repair.
Methods:
This was a prospective cohort study of 102 patients undergoing open prenatal SB repair from September 2011 to August 2021 at a single institution. All patients met the inclusion criteria of the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS), and the surgical procedure for in-utero SB repair was similar to that described in the MOMS trial. During the surgery, if primary skin approximation was not feasible due to the large size of the defect, the decision was at the discretion of the pediatric neurosurgeon to utilize a patch for closure. Neonatal outcomes at birth and 1-year outcomes were compared between the primary skin and patch-based closure groups.
Results:
Of 102 patients included in the study, 70 (68.6%) underwent primary skin closure and 32 (31.4%) patch-based closure. The patch type included acellular bovine skin matrix (Durepair®; n = 31) and human acellular dermal matrix (Alloderm®; n = 1). Fetuses with myeloschisis were more likely to require patch-based repair than those with myelomeningocele. The median time of fetal repair was 4 min longer for patch-based compared with primary skin closure (37 vs 33 min; P = 0.001). Following patch-based repair, neonates had a longer length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) by 24 days (adjusted risk ratio, 2.40 (95% CI, 1.41-4.29)) compared to those that underwent primary skin closure. There was no difference between the two groups in the other neonatal outcomes, including the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement and cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Outcome at 1 year of age was available for 90 infants. Need for wound revision within their first year after birth was more common in infants who underwent patch-based vs those with primary skin closure (19.4% vs 5.1%; P = 0.05). There was no difference between the two groups in other 1-year outcomes, including the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement by 1 year of age and surgery for tethered cord.
Conclusions:
Patch-based closure during SB repair is often needed in fetuses with myeloschisis and is associated with prolonged fetal surgery time, long NICU stay and need for wound revision within the first year after birth. Further studies are required to identify optimal patches for SB repair or alternative methods to improve outcome. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
