Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy
Published on: June 16, 2022
[Influence of different sphincter-preserving surgeries on postoperative defecation function]
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Low rectal cancer surgery can preserve the sphincter but often causes LARS (low anterior resection syndrome). Current surgical reconstructions do not fully restore defecation function, indicating a need for further research.
Area of Science:
- Colorectal surgery
- Oncology
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer surgery improves quality of life.
- Postoperative low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) significantly impacts patients, including fecal incontinence, urgency, and clustering.
- Despite advances, effective management of LARS remains a challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the impact of different surgical techniques for low rectal cancer on postoperative defecation function.
- To evaluate the efficacy of various bowel reconstruction methods in mitigating LARS.
- To identify current limitations and future directions in preserving bowel function after low rectal cancer surgery.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of surgical procedures for low rectal cancer, including low anterior resection (LAR), intersphincteric resection (ISR), and Parks procedure.
- Analysis of studies reporting on the incidence and severity of LARS following these procedures.
- Evaluation of evidence regarding the effectiveness of bowel reconstruction techniques (e.g., J pouch, end-to-side anastomosis, pouch reconstruction) in improving functional outcomes.
Main Results:
- Low anterior resection (LAR) is associated with a high incidence of LARS (up to 84.6%).
- Inter-sphincteric resection (ISR) generally results in worse postoperative function than LAR, with functional outcomes worsening with increased resection extent.
- While the Parks procedure may have inferior short-term function compared to LAR, gradual recovery is observed. Current bowel reconstructions have not significantly reduced LARS incidence or severity.
Conclusions:
- Current surgical approaches for low rectal cancer, including LAR and ISR, frequently lead to significant LARS.
- Modifications in bowel reconstruction, such as J pouches or pouch reconstructions, have not proven effective in reducing LARS.
- Significant improvements in preserving postoperative defecation function for patients with low rectal cancer are still needed, highlighting an unmet clinical need.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Other Laxatives
Osmotic or saline laxatives, like magnesium hydroxide or milk of...
Feces Formation and Defecation
The mass peristalsis then pushes the feces into the rectum, which stretches the rectal walls to activate...
Physiology of the Gastrointestinal System III: Elimination
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS

