Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.3K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.3K
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

8.1K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
8.1K
Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model01:13

Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model

125
Drugs administered through various routes can lead to nonlinear elimination, resulting in complex pharmacokinetic behaviors crucial to understanding efficacious drug dosing.
When a drug is administered through a constant intravenous infusion and eliminated via nonlinear pharmacokinetics, it follows zero-order input. For example, oral drugs undergo first-order absorption upon administration and are eliminated through nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
In the case of subcutaneously administered drugs,...
125
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.9K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.9K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.4K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.4K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

2.0K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
2.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anchor Detection Strategy in Moderated Non-Linear Factor Analysis for Differential Item Functioning (DIF).

Applied psychological measurement·2025
Same author

Development of a Method for Handling Doubly-Censored Data in a Latent Growth Curve Modeling Framework.

Multivariate behavioral research·2025
Same author

Breast cancer survivors' perceptual map of breast reconstruction appearance outcomes.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2025
Same author

Computer adaptive testing strategies for the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).

Archives of women's mental health·2025
Same author

A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2025
Same author

Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2024
Same journal

A Simple Approach for Differential Test Functioning Based on Sum Scores.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Factor Retention in Large Factor Analysis Models: A Simulation Study Comparing 15 Methods.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Agreement and Alignment in Binary Rating Tasks: Strategic Convergence as an Equilibrium Outcome.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Interactions Between Termination Criteria and Ability Estimators in Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Identification and Diagnosis of Misreporting in Surveys.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

The Aggregated Latent Profile Index: Measuring Person Profile Differentiation Within a Bootstrap-Validated Latent Profile Space.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

DIF Detection With Zero-Inflation Under the Factor Mixture Modeling Framework.

Sooyong Lee1, Suhwa Han1, Seung W Choi1

  • 1University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.

Educational and Psychological Measurement
|June 27, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method for detecting differential item functioning (DIF) in zero-inflated data by accounting for hidden subgroups. Factor mixture modeling (FMM) proved superior to the likelihood ratio (LR) DIF test in identifying DIF items.

Keywords:
DIFLR testMIMICfactor mixture modelingzero-inflation

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

895
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

895
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • Zero-inflated data, common in educational and psychological assessments, pose challenges for detecting differential item functioning (DIF).
  • Excessive zeros can mask true DIF effects, leading to underdetection and potentially biased results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a novel DIF detection procedure for zero-inflated data with unobserved heterogeneity.
  • To compare the performance of the proposed Factor Mixture Modeling (FMM) with MIMIC approach against the traditional Likelihood Ratio (LR) DIF test.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Factor Mixture Modeling (FMM) with MIMIC (multiple-indicator multiple-cause) to estimate latent classes and address unobserved heterogeneity.
  • Conducted a Monte Carlo simulation study to compare the proposed FMM procedure with the LR DIF test.

Main Results:

  • The FMM approach demonstrated superior detection power compared to the LR DIF test for zero-inflated data.
  • Results highlighted the critical importance of accounting for latent heterogeneity in the analysis of such data.
  • Empirical data analysis confirmed FMM's ability to identify additional DIF items missed by the LR test.

Conclusions:

  • Factor Mixture Modeling (FMM) offers a more powerful and accurate method for DIF detection in zero-inflated datasets with unobserved subgroups.
  • Accounting for latent heterogeneity is essential for robust DIF detection and accurate psychometric analysis of zero-inflated data.