Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

78.2K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
78.2K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

7.3K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
7.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

12.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
12.3K
Instrument Calibration01:12

Instrument Calibration

264
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
264
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments01:30

Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments

105
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments (EDMs) are essential tools in modern surveying, offering precise distance measurements by emitting electromagnetic signals and calculating the time required for these signals to travel to a target and return. Two primary types of signals are used in EDMs — light waves and microwaves — each suited to specific environmental and distance requirements. Light-wave-based EDMs utilize either infrared or laser light, providing high accuracy over...
105
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

186
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
186

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vital Measurements of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients as a Predictor of Long COVID: An EHR-based Cohort Study from the RECOVER Program in N3C.

Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine·2026
Same author

Optimal sequencing of brain radiotherapy and immunotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer and driver gene-negative, asymptomatic brain metastases.

BMC cancer·2026
Same author

Ultrafast solvent removal delivers high-loading of amorphous small-molecule drugs in polymeric microspheres with predictable in vivo performance.

Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society·2026
Same author

A Bayesian Survival Analysis on Long COVID and Non-Long COVID Patients: A Cohort Study Using National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) Data.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Intrathecal pemetrexed chemotherapy combined with systemic therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and leptomeningeal metastases: a retrospective study.

Frontiers in oncology·2025
Same author

A Bayesian Survival Analysis on Long COVID and non Long COVID patients: A Cohort Study Using National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) Data.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 6, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K

Uncover the reasons for performance differences between measurement functions (Provably).

Chao Wang1, Jianchuan Feng1, Linfang Liu1

  • 1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Data Science, School of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Applied Intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands)
|June 27, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study provides mathematical proofs for measuring knowledge base uncertainty, confirming that knowledge amount is a superior metric. The findings offer a universal and interpretable theoretical basis for various knowledge bases.

Keywords:
Concept structureKnowledge baseKnowledge structureProBaseRough set theoryUncertainty

More Related Videos

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

11.5K
Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 6, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

11.5K
Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Information Science
  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Experimental conclusions on knowledge base uncertainty measures lack theoretical interpretation.
  • Previous research relied on limited datasets, questioning the universality of findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide rigorous theoretical interpretations for uncertainty measures in knowledge bases.
  • To establish the superiority of knowledge amount as a metric for knowledge base uncertainty.
  • To demonstrate the universality and interpretability of these findings across different knowledge base types.

Main Methods:

  • Review of mathematical theories, definitions, and tools for knowledge base uncertainty.
  • Development of rigorous theoretical proofs to support the knowledge amount metric.
  • Experimental validation on diverse datasets, including probabilistic taxonomies like ProBase.

Main Results:

  • Theoretical proofs confirm the superiority of knowledge amount for measuring knowledge base uncertainty.
  • Experimental results validate the enhanced performance of the knowledge amount metric.
  • The proposed method demonstrates applicability to knowledge bases not classifiable by entity attributes.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a mathematically-backed theoretical foundation for measuring knowledge base uncertainty.
  • Knowledge amount is confirmed as a superior and universally applicable metric.
  • Findings offer significant implications for the theoretical basis and practical application of uncertainty measurement in knowledge bases.