Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testosterone Replacement Therapy: Playing Catch-up With Patients.

Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS·2019
Same author

Benzodiazepine use and hip fractures in older adults.

American family physician·2013
Same author

When the snowbirds return.

Medical economics·2003
Same author

What an FP's week is really like.

Medical economics·2003
Same author

Running late.

Medical economics·2002
Same author

CME zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Medical economics·2002

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 6, 2025

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

3.0K

Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty: Which Surgical Approach Is Optimal?

William T Sheahan1, Thomas E Sheahan1

  • 1Orlando Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Florida.

Federal Practitioner : for the Health Care Professionals of the VA, Dod, and PHS
|June 27, 2022
PubMed
Summary

The optimal total hip arthroplasty approach remains debated. This case report compares mini posterior and direct anterior hip replacement techniques, emphasizing patient-surgeon collaboration for informed decision-making in total hip arthroplasty.

More Related Videos

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
09:31

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Published on: February 27, 2018

11.9K
Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs
08:40

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs

Published on: April 19, 2024

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 6, 2025

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

3.0K
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
09:31

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Published on: February 27, 2018

11.9K
Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs
08:40

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs

Published on: April 19, 2024

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomechanics
  • Patient Outcomes

Background:

  • The standard posterior approach has long been the preferred method for total hip arthroplasty.
  • Modified muscle-sparing techniques, such as the mini posterior and direct anterior approaches, have emerged.
  • Debate continues regarding the optimal surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a case of end-stage degenerative joint disease of the right hip.
  • To compare the mini posterior and direct anterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty.
  • To highlight the patient's role in selecting the surgical procedure.

Main Methods:

  • Case report detailing a patient with severe hip osteoarthritis.
  • Comparative analysis of mini posterior and direct anterior surgical techniques.
  • Discussion of patient-specific factors influencing surgical approach selection.

Main Results:

  • The case illustrates the clinical presentation of end-stage hip arthritis.
  • A comparison of the mini posterior and direct anterior approaches is provided.
  • The patient's ultimate choice of procedure is documented.

Conclusions:

  • The selection of a total hip arthroplasty approach should be individualized.
  • A strong patient-surgeon relationship is crucial for informed decision-making.
  • Shared decision-making ensures the optimal surgical outcome for total hip arthroplasty.