Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Contemporary Evaluation and Management
Mohamed Salah Abdelghani1, Sundus Sardar2, Abdelhaleem Shawky Hamada1
1Department of Adult Cardiology, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Insights
Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) management is debated. This review examines evidence for early aortic valve replacement (AVR) to prevent irreversible heart damage, considering new intervention techniques.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Valvular Heart Disease
Background:
- Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease, particularly in the elderly.
- Current guidelines recommend intervention for symptomatic severe AS, but evidence for intervention in asymptomatic patients is limited.
- The optimal timing for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in asymptomatic severe AS (ASAS) remains controversial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review contemporary evaluation and management strategies for ASAS.
- To summarize scientific evidence on the optimal timing for intervention in ASAS.
- To discuss indications for early AVR in ASAS before irreversible myocardial damage occurs.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of contemporary studies and guidelines.
- Analysis of evidence supporting intervention timing in ASAS.
- Evaluation of advancements in percutaneous and surgical AVR approaches.
Main Results:
- Evidence supporting current indications for AVR in asymptomatic patients is considered weak.
- Advancements in AVR techniques have reduced mortality and complications.
- Some evidence suggests earlier AVR may prevent subclinical myocardial damage.
Conclusions:
- The optimal timing for intervention in ASAS requires further investigation.
- Early AVR may be beneficial in specific ASAS scenarios to prevent irreversible myocardial damage.
- Improved AVR techniques support considering earlier intervention in select ASAS patients.
Abstract:
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease in developed countries and most prevalent in the elderly. According to the current guidelines, intervention is recommended in symptomatic severe AS; however, in asymptomatic patients, aortic valve replacement (AVR) is considered when symptoms appear or the left ventricular dysfunction occurs, but the evidence supports these indications are poor. The optimal timing and modality of intervention in asymptomatic severe AS (ASAS) remain controversial. Earlier AVR in certain scenarios has been increasingly supported by some groups before subclinical irreversible myocardial damage occurs. In addition, the continuous advancement of percutaneous and surgical approaches where associated with a substantial decrease in mortality and perioperative complications which made many authors advocate for early intervention in those patients. Our review highlights the contemporary evaluation and management of ASAS and summarizes the current scientific evidence regarding optimal timing for intervention and indications for early AVR in such patients.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

