The Effect of Preterm Birth on Maximal Aerobic Exercise Capacity and Lung Function in Healthy Adults: A Systematic
Thomas Gostelow1, Eric J Stöhr2,3
1School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
Insights
Adults born prematurely have reduced maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max) and lung function (FEV1), even when maintaining similar physical activity levels. This study highlights potential long-term health impacts beyond exercise habits.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pulmonology
- Sports Medicine
Background:
- Premature birth is linked to adult health issues, but its effect on aerobic capacity in active individuals is unclear.
- This study investigates if premature birth impacts maximal aerobic exercise capacity (VO2max) and lung function in healthy, physically active adults.
Approach:
- A systematic literature search of the PubMed database was conducted.
- A meta-analysis focused on studies comparing VO2max and FEV1 in preterm-born and term-born adults with similar physical activity levels.
Key Points:
- Meta-analysis of 11 studies (n=688) revealed significantly reduced VO2max in preterm-born adults.
- Analysis of 6 studies (n=296) showed significantly reduced FEV1 in preterm-born adults.
- These reductions were observed independent of physical activity levels.
Conclusions:
- Premature birth is associated with reduced VO2max and FEV1 in healthy, active adults.
- Future research should explore underlying causes and non-exercise-based interventions to improve cardiorespiratory health in this population.
Background:
A negative impact of premature birth on health in adulthood is well established. However, it is not clear whether healthy adults who were born prematurely but have similar physical activity levels compared to adults born at term have a reduced maximal aerobic exercise capacity (maximum oxygen consumption [VO2max]).
Objective:
We aimed to determine the effect of premature birth on aerobic exercise capacity and lung function in otherwise healthy, physically active individuals.
Methods:
A broad literature search was conducted in the PubMed database. Search terms included 'preterm/premature birth' and 'aerobic exercise capacity'. Maximal oxygen consumption (mL/kg/min) was the main variable required for inclusion, and amongst those investigations forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1, % predicted) was evaluated as a secondary parameter. For the systematic review, 29 eligible articles were identified. Importantly, for the meta-analysis, only studies which reported similar activity levels between healthy controls and the preterm group/s were included, resulting in 11 articles for the VO2max analysis (total n = 688, n = 333 preterm and n = 355 controls) and six articles for the FEV1 analysis (total n = 296, n = 147 preterm and n = 149 controls). Data were analysed using Review Manager ( Review Manager. RevMan version 5.4 software. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2020.).
Results:
The systematic review highlighted the broad biological impact of premature birth. While the current literature tends to suggest that there may be a negative impact of premature birth on both VO2max and FEV1, several studies did not control for the potential influence of differing physical activity levels between study groups, thus justifying a focused meta-analysis of selected studies. Our meta-analysis strongly suggests that prematurely born humans who are otherwise healthy do have a reduced VO2max (mean difference: - 4.40 [95% confidence interval - 6.02, - 2.78] mL/kg/min, p < 0.00001, test for overall effect: Z = 5.32) and FEV1 (mean difference - 9.22 [95% confidence interval - 13.54, - 4.89] % predicted, p < 0.0001, test for overall effect: Z = 4.18) independent of physical activity levels.
Conclusions:
Whilst the current literature contains mixed findings on the effects of premature birth on VO2max and FEV1, our focused meta-analysis suggests that even when physical activity levels are similar, there is a clear reduction in VO2max and FEV1 in adults born prematurely. Therefore, future studies should carefully investigate the underlying determinants of the reduced VO2max and FEV1 in humans born preterm, and develop strategies to improve their maximal aerobic capacity and lung function beyond physical activity interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Respiratory Capacities
One key metric is the Inspiratory Capacity (IC), which represents the maximum amount of air that can be inhaled with full effort. IC is calculated by summing the tidal volume and inspiratory reserve volume, typically ranging from 2.4 to 3.6 liters.
The Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) represents the air in the...
Lung Capacity
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...
Pulmonary Function Tests
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
Exercise and Cardiac Output
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be...
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities


