Are verbatim transcripts necessary in applied qualitative research: experiences from two community-based intervention
Zelee Hill1, Charlotte Tawiah-Agyemang2, Betty Kirkwood3
1Institute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford St., London, WC1N 1EH, UK. z.hill@ucl.ac.uk.
Abstract:
Conducting qualitative research within public health trials requires balancing timely data collection with the need to maintain data quality. Verbatim transcription of interviews is the conventional way of recording qualitative data, but is time consuming and can severely delay the availability of research findings. Expanding field notes into fair notes is a quicker alternative method, but is not usually recommended as interviewers select and interpret what they record. We used the fair note methodology in Ghana, and found that where research questions are relatively simple, and interviewers undergo sufficient training and supervision, fair notes can decrease data collection and analysis time, while still providing detailed and relevant information to the study team. Interviewers liked the method and felt it made them more reflective and analytical and improved their interview technique. The exception was focus group discussions, where the fair note approach failed to capture the interaction and richness of discussions, capturing group consensus rather than the discussions leading to this consensus.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Master Transcription Regulators
Transfer RNA Synthesis
Naturalistic Observations
GTPases and their Regulation
