Identification of risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in intensive care unit patients (GIBICU study)
Alexander Poszler1, Evelyn Nguyen2, Matthias Christoph Braunisch3
1Department of Gastroenterology, Krankenhaus Agatharied, Hausham, Germany.
Background And Goals:
Risk stratification for the need for therapeutic endoscopy and prediction of mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) can be assessed by several scores. However, current scores are not validated for variceal bleeding and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential parameters for the prediction of UGIB and patient outcomes.
Patients And Study Methods:
In this monocenter retrospective observational study, data from all esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD) between November 2014 and February 2020 with suspected hemorrhage in our ICU were evaluated.
Results:
Out of 345 included EGD, 42.3% of UGIB was diagnosed. 51.9% needed endoscopic intervention. Overall, 52.3% of included patients with UGIB died. Logistic regression showed that preceding variceal or non-variceal UGIB (p < .001), serum lactate (p = .001), heart rate (HR) (p = .005), and blood transfusions (p = .001) were significant predictors of UGIB. Previous UGIB (p < .001), male sex (p = .015), known varices (p < .001), serum albumin (p = .19) and use of catecholamines (p = .040) were significant predictors for the need of endoscopic intervention. Higher mortality was significantly associated with the usage of steroids (p < .001), malignant preconditions (p = .021), serum albumin (p = .020) and prolonged PTT (partial thromboplastin time) (p = .001).
Conclusions:
We were able to identify additional parameters that had previously not been included in existing scores to predict the risk of UGIB, the need for therapeutic endoscopy and mortality in ICU patients. Therefore, an extension of these scores is necessary. Further validation of identified parameters in multicenter trials is needed to improve risk scores for ICU patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:28Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
01:30Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction
An acute ulcer, marked by superficial erosion and minimal inflammation, swiftly resolves upon identifying and addressing the underlying cause. In contrast, a chronic ulcer persists, potentially eroding through the muscular wall and forming fibrous tissue.
Peptic ulcers can also be...
01:24Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
01:26Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current...
01:23Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical manifestations of acute gastritis
The patient with acute gastritis may have a rapid onset of symptoms, such as epigastric pain or discomfort, dyspepsia, anorexia, hiccups, or nausea and vomiting, which can last from a few hours to a few days. Erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis may cause bleeding, which may manifest as blood in vomit or as...
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.