Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Typical Model Studies01:30

Typical Model Studies

436
Fluid mechanics model studies often utilize scaled-down systems to predict fluid behavior in full-scale environments, such as river flows, dam spillways, and structures interacting with open surfaces. Maintaining Froude number similarity in river models is crucial, as it replicates surface flow features like wave patterns and velocities.
436
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway01:21

Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway

285
Scaled hydraulic models of dam spillways provide a practical way to replicate and study the intricate flow dynamics of these structures. Often built to a 1:15 ratio, these models allow for observing critical water behavior, such as velocity distribution, flow patterns, and energy dissipation.
285
Rapidly Varying Flow01:24

Rapidly Varying Flow

136
Rapidly varying flow (RVF) in open channels is characterized by abrupt changes in flow depth over a short distance, with the rate of depth change relative to distance often approaching unity. These flows are inherently complex due to their transient and multi-dimensional nature, making exact analysis difficult. However, approximate solutions using simplified models provide valuable insights into their behavior.Key Features of Rapidly Varying FlowRVF is commonly observed in scenarios involving...
136
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

97
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
97
Energy Considerations in Open Channel Flow01:27

Energy Considerations in Open Channel Flow

168
Open channel flow, where a fluid flows with a free surface exposed to the atmosphere, is primarily governed by gravitational and surface effects, distinguishing it from closed conduit or pipe flow. In open channels such as rivers, canals, and artificial channels, energy analysis provides valuable insights into flow behavior and the relationship between depth, velocity, and slope.Specific Energy and Flow DepthIn open channel flow, the specific energy, E, combines the gravitational potential...
168
Modeling and Similitude01:12

Modeling and Similitude

325
Scaled modeling is a fundamental technique in engineering, enabling the study of large and complex systems by creating smaller, manageable replicas that recreate critical characteristics of the original. In hydrology and civil infrastructure, for example, scaled models of dams help analyze water flow, turbulence, and pressure. This method allows for accurate predictions of real-world behavior within a controlled environment, significantly reducing the cost and time involved in full-scale...
325

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The in-stream renewable energy potential of rivers for remote communities in the global Arctic.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Liquid-liquid phase reaction between crystal violet and sodium hydroxide: kinetic study and precipitate analysis.

Royal Society open science·2022
Same author

Impacts of Channel Morphodynamics on Fish Habitat Utilization.

Environmental management·2019
Same author

Hypoxic conditions in stormwater retention ponds: potential for hydrogen sulfide emission.

Environmental technology·2017
Same author

Flow in bedrock canyons.

Nature·2014
Same author

Stochastic calibration of riverine water quality models.

Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation·2010
Same journal

Explainable machine learning deciphers and quantifies material-microbe-methane pathways in zero-valent iron-enhanced anaerobic digestion.

Journal of environmental management·2026
Same journal

Linking nitrogen transformations and soil δ<sup>15</sup>N to assess drivers of nitrogen losses across a tropical peat swamp forest and an oil palm plantation.

Journal of environmental management·2026
Same journal

Implications of electric mobility on health and environmental justice.

Journal of environmental management·2026
Same journal

Riverine nitrous oxide dynamics across China: Scale-dependent patterns and environmental controls.

Journal of environmental management·2026
Same journal

Co-composting and organic amendments as tools to accelerate soil maturation in purple soils: Insights into soil properties and agricultural potential.

Journal of environmental management·2026
Same journal

Cadmium pollution alters the priming effect of biochar application on soil organic carbon mineralization.

Journal of environmental management·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.1K

Impact evaluation of instream bar management using morphodynamic modelling.

Qingcheng Yu1, Colin D Rennie1, Jonathan M Slaney2

  • 1Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, Canada.

Journal of Environmental Management
|June 30, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bar realignment in the Bow River can protect aquatic habitats and enhance recreation. However, bar removal is more effective for lowering future flood levels by creating a less obstructed channel, mitigating flood risk.

Keywords:
Aquatic habitatBar realignmentBar removalFloodGravel barMorphodynamic modelling

More Related Videos

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.6K
Visualizing Hyporheic Flow Through Bedforms Using Dye Experiments and Simulation
09:49

Visualizing Hyporheic Flow Through Bedforms Using Dye Experiments and Simulation

Published on: November 18, 2015

12.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.1K
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.6K
Visualizing Hyporheic Flow Through Bedforms Using Dye Experiments and Simulation
09:49

Visualizing Hyporheic Flow Through Bedforms Using Dye Experiments and Simulation

Published on: November 18, 2015

12.3K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Engineering
  • River Geomorphology
  • Flood Risk Management

Background:

  • The 2013 Bow River flood caused significant damage in Calgary.
  • Post-flood bar growth has narrowed the river channel, increasing flood risk.
  • The efficacy of bar removal for flood mitigation remains uncertain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate bar removal and realignment strategies for flood mitigation.
  • To assess impacts on aquatic habitats and river recreation.
  • To model future channel responses to different bar management plans.

Main Methods:

  • Developed and calibrated a 2D hydrodynamic model using Delft3D.
  • Validated a morphodynamic model with post-flood bed elevation data.
  • Simulated and compared flood peaks and channel morphology under different bar management scenarios.

Main Results:

  • Bar realignment preserves aquatic habitat and offers recreation benefits.
  • Bar removal more effectively reduces future flood peak levels.
  • Instream bar manipulation has minimal downstream morphological effects.

Conclusions:

  • Creating a less obstructed channel is key for flood mitigation.
  • Bar management strategies offer trade-offs between flood control, habitat, and recreation.
  • Further research into optimal bar management is warranted.