Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
The effect of Rear-End collisions on triaxial acceleration to occupant cervical and lumbar Spines: An analysis of
Caitlin H McCleery1, Manon Limousis-Gayda1, Eloy Rubio1
1National Biomechanics Institute, 2708 Wilshire Blvd, #311, Santa Monica, CA 90403, USA.
Abstract:
Rear-end impacts are the most frequent type of the more than seven million motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) occurring annually in the United States. The cervical and lumbar spine are the most commonly injured sites as a result of rear-end collisions. The direction and magnitude of accelerations and forces to the spine are considered primary indicators of injury. Yet, there is a dearth of research regarding the relation and quantification of vehicle to occupant accelerations, as well as triaxial acceleration components (and thus, forces) to occupant spines in rear-end impacts. Therefore, the current study utilizes the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety (IIHS) test database to examine the relative relations between vehicle and occupant accelerations, as well as between component accelerations experienced at the cervical and lumbar spines in rear-end collisions. Anthropometric test device (ATD) head and pelvis accelerometer data from IIHS sled testing are used as representative measures of acceleration experienced at the cervical and lumbar spine, respectively. Peak resultant acceleration is calculated at the head and pelvis, and peak directional components (x, y, and z) of acceleration are compared to resultants. This analysis revealed significantly higher occupant head than sled (2.17 ± 0.4 × Sled; p < 0.001) and pelvis than sled (1.24 ± 0.27 × Sled; p < 0.001) accelerations. There were also significant differences across triaxial acceleration components relative to resultant at the head (x = 0.99 ± 0.02, y = 0.11 ± 0.05, z = 0.34 ± 0.06; p < 0.001 for all comparisons) and pelvis (x = 0.94 ± 0.06, y = 0.12 ± 0.14, z = 0.35 ± 0.08; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). A secondary analysis examining differences in occupant dynamics by seat designs across vehicle type revealed significant differences only between the pelvis z component accelerations in the passenger vehicle and SUV groups (passenger vehicle:SUV = 1.07, p < 0.001). Due to the uniform nature of IIHS sled testing protocols, this analysis reflects similarities in seat properties rather than between vehicle types. These results may provide a simplistic approach to quantify the magnitude of directional accelerations and forces to occupant spines in rear-end collisions.
Related Concept Videos
Vertebral Column: Regions and Curvature
Regions of the Vertebral Column
In an adult, the spine is subdivided into five regions: the cervical, the thoracic, the lumbar, the sacral, and the coccygeal region. The spine initially develops as a series of 33 vertebrae; after 20 years of age, the nine bones in the sacral region, five sacral, and four coccygeal bones fuse to form...
General Case of Eccentric Axial Loading
Consider a member subjected to equal and opposite forces that are applied along a line that does not coincide with the member's neutral axis. In unsymmetrical...
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...

