Utilization and Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure - A Report From
Hideka Hayashi1, Satoshi Yasuda1, Makoto Nakano1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital Sendai Japan.
Insights
Only half of eligible chronic heart failure patients receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Older age increases the risk of not receiving CRT, potentially leading to higher mortality and hospital admissions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is established for chronic heart failure (CHF) with reduced ejection fraction and wide QRS.
- Limited data exist on CRT utilization and long-term outcomes in Japan.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the appropriate use and outcomes of CRT in Japanese CHF patients.
- To identify factors influencing CRT implantation and its impact on patient prognosis.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 3,447 symptomatic CHF patients from the CHART-2 Study.
- Categorization into four groups based on CRT indication and implantation status.
- Statistical adjustment for confounders to assess outcomes.
Main Results:
- Only 47% of the 91 eligible patients received CRT.
- Increasing age was significantly associated with not receiving CRT (OR 1.46 per 5-year increase).
- Patients with an indication but no CRT (Group B) had the highest incidence of cardiovascular death and CHF admission.
Conclusions:
- Suboptimal CRT utilization was observed in eligible Japanese CHF patients.
- Aging is a significant barrier to CRT use.
- Withholding CRT from indicated patients increases risks of mortality and hospitalization.
Abstract:
Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and wide QRS (≥120 ms), data on the use of or long-term outcomes after CRT implantation in Japan are limited. We examined proper CRT utilization and outcomes in 3,447 consecutive symptomatic CHF patients registered in the CHART-2 Study. We identified 167 potentially eligible patients and divided them into 4 groups according to the presence (+) or absence (-) of an indication for and implantation of CRT: Group A (reference group), (+)indication/(+)CRT; Group B, (+)indication/(-)CRT; Group C, (-)indication/(+)CRT; and Group D, (-)indication/(-)CRT. Based on the Japanese Circulation Society guidelines, 91 patients met the eligibility for CRT implantation, with 43 (47%) of them undergoing CRT implantation. After adjusting for confounders, age was significantly associated with no CRT use (odds ratio per 5-year increase 1.46; 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.05; P=0.012). Among the 4 groups, the cumulative incidence of cardiovascular death and CHF admission were highest in Group B and lowest in Group D (P=0.029). In this study, only half the eligible CHF patients properly received CRT. Aging was a significant risk factor for no CRT use. Patients without CRT despite having an indication could be at higher risk of mortality and CHF admission.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation


