Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

12:55
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
8.5K
Understanding Individual Differences in Metacognitive Strategy Use, Task Demand, and Performance in Integrated L2
Weiwei Zhang1, Meijuan Zhao2, Ye Zhu3
1School of Foreign Languages and International Education, Quzhou University, Quzhou, China.
Frontiers in Psychology
|July 1, 2022
Summary
Individual differences in metacognitive strategies significantly impact Chinese English-as-foreign-language learners during L2 speaking assessments. However, these strategies did not correlate with speaking performance in this study.
Area of Science:
- Second Language Acquisition
- Metacognition in Language Learning
- Bilingual Speech Production
Background:
- Investigated individual differences (IDs) in metacognitive strategy use among Chinese English-as-foreign-language (EFL) learners.
- Examined the relationship between metacognitive strategies, task demand, and learner performance within Kormos' Bilingual Speech Production Model.
- Focused on the context of integrated L2 speaking assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze individual variations in the application of planning, problem-solving, monitoring, and evaluating strategies.
- To determine how metacognitive strategies interact with task demands in L2 speaking assessments.
- To explore the connection between metacognitive strategy use and actual speaking performance in Chinese EFL learners.
Main Methods:
- Administered a metacognitive strategy inventory to 134 Chinese EFL learners post-assessment.
- Utilized descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression for data examination.
- Assessed strategy use across four integrated L2 speaking assessment tasks.
Main Results:
- Significant individual differences were observed in metacognitive strategy use.
- Problem-solving strategies were most frequent, while monitoring strategies were least frequent.
- Metacognitive strategies interacted dynamically with task demands, but no direct correlation was found with speaking performance.
Conclusions:
- Metacognitive strategy use, individually or interactively, did not predict speaking performance in this Chinese EFL context.
- Findings offer insights into metacognition in L2 speech production under assessment conditions, supporting Kormos' model.
- Results have implications for L2 speaking instruction and assessment, highlighting the complex role of individual differences.
Related Concept Videos
Metacognition
271
Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...
271
Language and Cognition
434
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
434

